llamaperf

Local model performance on your hardware

Find which open-weight LLMs fit in your GPU or Mac and compare the speeds people report on setups like yours.

What runs on your hardware?

Pick your GPU or Mac, then read the speeds people reported on it, or estimate which models fit and how fast they run.

Free to use. No account needed. Memory estimates and community measurements are labelled separately.

Looking for a particular model?

Search for a model to see its reported speeds across GPUs and Macs.

Local model performance reports from the community

These are individual setups, not a controlled benchmark. Compare GPU count, quantization, context and offloading before comparing speeds. How to read a report →

GPU: Intel Arc A770 16GB
Compare setup details (1 active)

Exact recorded values. Context may be a configured limit; matching filters does not establish identical prompts, offloading or concurrency.

Tone: positiveIntel hardware
generation:
49.0 tokens/s
prompt processing (prefill):
48.0 tokens/s
quant:
Q6_K (GGUF)
kv:
q4_1
flash attention:
on

Reported by the source; GPU count, offloading and concurrent requests can change these figures. Prompt-processing speed is input throughput, not time to first token. Check the full setup before comparing.

codingtool-usevisionlong-contextagentic

User reports Qwen3.5-9B at 49 t/s generation and 48 t/s prompt processing on an Intel Arc A770 16GB. Setup is llama.cpp b9521 (Vulkan) with Q6_K weights, q4_1 KV cache, 256K context, flash attention, vision mmproj and MTP speculative decoding on a single slot. The same model under WSL2 with Q8_0 KV cache and 128K context reached about 40 t/s without vision. Qwopus3.5-4B-Coder hit 64 t/s generation and 100 t/s prompt at 96K context, and Gemma 4 12B reached 22 t/s generation and 74 t/s prompt at 128K context.

Oct 7, 2026
Intel hardware
generation:
14.4 tokens/s
quant:
Q4_K_M (GGUF)

Reported by the source; GPU count, offloading and concurrent requests can change these figures. Prompt-processing speed is shown only when the source reports it; generation speed cannot tell us time to first token. Check the full setup before comparing.

coding

User reports Qwen3.6-27B-A3B-Coder at 14.4 t/s decode on an Intel Arc A770 16GB, scoring 10/10 on a Lua CSV parser acceptance task. Setup is llama.cpp with the SYCL backend and GGUF Q4_K_M weights, a comparison point against arcint's own AWQ IR serving on the same card. The figure is described as a rough bound rather than a directly comparable measurement, since the quantisation and engine differ from arcint's production configuration.

Oct 5, 2026
Intel hardware
generation:
33.2 tokens/s
quant:
Q8_0 (GGUF)

Reported by the source; GPU count, offloading and concurrent requests can change these figures. Prompt-processing speed is shown only when the source reports it; generation speed cannot tell us time to first token. Check the full setup before comparing.

User benchmarks Qwen3-1.7B at 33.2 tok/s on an Intel Arc A770 16GB using llama.cpp with the SYCL backend. Setup is llama.cpp SYCL with Q8_0 quantisation, single-stream (n_parallel=1). OpenVINO via OVMS reached 65.4 tok/s on the same model. Ten models were tested in total, with OpenVINO faster than SYCL on every model.

Sep 23, 2026
Showing 1–3 of 3
Page 1 of 1

Community benchmarks snapshot

Records by GPU

AMD Strix Halo 128GB294NVIDIA RTX 3090190NVIDIA RTX 5090134NVIDIA DGX Spark77M5 Max 48GB65NVIDIA RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell62NVIDIA RTX 5060 Ti 16GB58NVIDIA RTX 3060 12GB54AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 32GB50M4 Max 128GB49

Records by model

2211 total
Qwen3.81021
Qwen3.6238
DeepSeek V4 Flash147
Gemma 4144
Qwen3.597
Qwen353
other511

Records by engine

1645 total
llama.cpp875
vLLM189
MLX100
Strata70
Ollama62
other349

Use cases

coding 556agentic 357long-context 272tool-use 153vision 109summarization 53math 43creative-writing 37multilingual 23text-generation 9rp 8reasoning 3
coding556agentic357long-context272tool-use153vision109summarization53math43creative-writing37

Median generation t/s by GPU

On Qwen3.8 27B at 4-bit, plain single-GPU runs. Full ranking

RTX 509082RTX Pro 600067M5 Ultra 256GB50RX 7900 XTX48RTX 309036RTX 5090 Laptop 24GB34RTX 409032V100 32GB31Radeon AI PRO R9700 32GB30RX 7800 XT 16GB30

Prompt processing, same model

M5 Ultra 256GB1800RX 7900 XTX530RTX 3090561RTX 40901949V100 32GB941RTX 3080 20GB997Arc Pro B70512M1 Ultra 128GB153Arc Pro B60 24GB380M1 Max 32GB82

Reports by model size

Qwen3.8 27B566Qwen3.8 125B · 6B active371DeepSeek V4 Flash 284B · 13B active130Qwen3.6 35B · 3B active129Qwen3.6 27B72Gemma 4 26B · 4B active36GLM-5.3 320B · 18B active33DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 552B · 16B active28

Quants

Q4_K_M290UD-Q4_K_XL140NVFP4120Q8_0984-bit79Q4_K_XL71IQ4_XS70MXFP458IQ3_XXS52Q450