llamaperf

Local model performance on your hardware

Find which open-weight LLMs fit in your GPU or Mac and compare the speeds people report on setups like yours.

Join the community

Follow along:XLinkedIn

What runs on your hardware?

Pick your GPU or Mac, then read the speeds people reported on it, or estimate which models fit and how fast they run.

Free to use. No account needed. Memory estimates and community measurements are labelled separately.

Looking for a particular model?

Search for a model to see its reported speeds across GPUs and Macs.

Local model performance reports from the community

These are individual setups, not a controlled benchmark. Compare GPU count, quantization, context and offloading before comparing speeds. How to read a report →

GPU: NVIDIA RTX 4070 Ti
Compare setup details (1 active)

Exact recorded values. Context may be a configured limit; matching filters does not establish identical prompts, offloading or concurrency.

NVIDIA hardware
generation:
69.7 tokens/s
prompt processing (prefill):
6757.3 tokens/s
quant:
Q8_0 (GGUF)

User reports Gemma 4 E4B at 69.66 t/s generation and 6757.3 t/s prompt processing on an NVIDIA RTX 4070 Ti. Setup is llama.cpp with Q8_0 and requested GPU layers 999, a direct full-offload run on a 12GB card. The figures come from a synthetic pp512/tg128 test at zero context depth, so they do not measure generation after a filled context.

Oct 14, 2026

Qwen3.8 27B

NVIDIA RTX 4070 Ti · llama.cpp · 4,096 ctx

NVIDIA hardware
generation:
43.6 tokens/s
prompt processing (prefill):
943.3 tokens/s
quant:
UD-IQ2_XXS (GGUF)
kv:
Q8

User benchmarks Qwen3.8-27B at 43.643 generation tok/s and 943.278 prompt tok/s on an RTX 4070 Ti 12GB. Setup is llama.cpp b10448 with UD-IQ2_XXS GGUF, Q8 KV cache, 4096-token context, all 66 layers on GPU, one slot, 256-token outputs. A second quant UD-Q2_K_XL decoded 38.030 tok/s and 995.095 prompt tok/s with 1,583 MiB more peak VRAM. An IQ2 context ladder gave 41.124 tok/s at 4K, 40.522 at 8K and 39.201 at 16K (12,831 prompt tokens, 11.119 s TTFT). An isolated IQ2 draft-mtp experiment raised throughput 47.284% on prose and 92.651% on Python code, but prose output diverged at token 16, so MTP stays off by default. In a 24-task quality pass, Q2 scored 10/24 and IQ2 9/24 (McNemar p = 1.0).

Sep 28, 2026
Showing 1–2 of 2
Page 1 of 1

Community benchmarks snapshot

Records by GPU

AMD Strix Halo 128GB323NVIDIA RTX 3090221NVIDIA RTX 5090171NVIDIA DGX Spark92NVIDIA RTX 5060 Ti 16GB72NVIDIA RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell71M5 Max 48GB67NVIDIA RTX 3060 12GB65AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 32GB63NVIDIA RTX 409057

Records by model

2726 total
Qwen3.81289
Qwen3.6285
Gemma 4168
DeepSeek V4 Flash149
Qwen3.5123
Qwen375
other637

Records by engine

1998 total
llama.cpp1015
vLLM209
Strata151
MLX107
Ollama84
other432

Use cases

coding 743agentic 473long-context 346tool-use 210vision 143summarization 61math 58creative-writing 47multilingual 30rp 13text-generation 9reasoning 3
coding743agentic473long-context346tool-use210vision143summarization61math58creative-writing47

Median generation t/s by GPU

On Qwen3.8 27B at 4-bit, plain single-GPU runs. Full ranking

RTX 509080RTX Pro 600067RTX 5070 Ti55M5 Ultra 256GB50RX 7900 XTX43RTX 409040RTX 309037RX 7800 XT 16GB35RTX 5090 Laptop 24GB34M3 Ultra 512GB32

Prompt processing, same model

M5 Ultra 256GB1800RX 7900 XTX640RTX 40901949RTX 3090561M3 Ultra 512GB391V100 32GB941Radeon AI PRO R9700 32GB1287RTX 3080 20GB997Arc Pro B70512M1 Ultra 128GB153

Reports by model size

Qwen3.8 27B717Qwen3.8 125B · 6B active508Qwen3.6 35B · 3B active194DeepSeek V4 Flash 284B · 13B active132Qwen3.6 27B80Gemma 4 26B · 4B active59DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 552B · 16B active51GLM-5.3 320B · 18B active45

Quants

Q4_K_M344UD-Q4_K_XL159NVFP4149Q8_01074-bit94IQ4_XS76Q4_K_XL75MXFP466IQ3_XXS66IQ3_S60