llamaperf

Local model performance on your hardware

Find which open-weight LLMs fit in your GPU or Mac and compare the speeds people report on setups like yours.

What runs on your hardware?

Pick your GPU or Mac, then read the speeds people reported on it, or estimate which models fit and how fast they run.

Free to use. No account needed. Memory estimates and community measurements are labelled separately.

Looking for a particular model?

Search for a model to see its reported speeds across GPUs and Macs.

Local model performance reports from the community

These are individual setups, not a controlled benchmark. Compare GPU count, quantization, context and offloading before comparing speeds. How to read a report →

GPU: Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB
Compare setup details (1 active)

Exact recorded values. Context may be a configured limit; matching filters does not establish identical prompts, offloading or concurrency.

Qwen3.8 27B

Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB · llama.cpp · 32,768 ctx

Tone: positiveIntel hardware
generation:
53.3 tokens/s
prompt processing (prefill):
420.0 tokens/s
quant:
Q4_K_M (GGUF)
kv:
F16

Reported by the source; GPU count, offloading and concurrent requests can change these figures. Prompt-processing speed is input throughput, not time to first token. Check the full setup before comparing.

codingagentic

User reports Qwen3.8-27B at 53.3 tok/s per-request decode (47 to 58 across eight requests) on an Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB. Setup is llama.cpp Vulkan build b11524 with Q4_K_M and an F16 KV cache, a DFlash2 draft model, one request at a time, 32K context, the whole model on the card. The repo's 42.3 tok/s headline is wall-clock eval-suite throughput with prompt processing included, not a decode rate; stock llama.cpp with no drafter gave 16 tok/s in llama-bench tg32. Prompt reading at 32K was 420 tok/s with the Intel FA kernel, versus 118 tok/s stock.

Oct 11, 2026
Tone: positiveIntel hardware
generation:
91.9 tokens/s
prompt processing (prefill):
1760.0 tokens/s
quant:
Q4_0 (GGUF)

Reported by the source; GPU count, offloading and concurrent requests can change these figures. Prompt-processing speed is input throughput, not time to first token. Check the full setup before comparing.

agenticcoding

User reports Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B at 91.91 tok/s decode on 2x Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB. Setup is llama.cpp SYCL with Q4_0 weights and an MTP Q8_0 drafter at --spec-draft-n-max 7, 22.18 GiB VRAM, 1,760 tok/s prefill at 12K context. MTP acceptance is 99.5-100% at every n-max; the model needs the whole card with no co-residence.

Oct 3, 2026

Qwen3.8 27B

Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB · llama.cpp · 512 ctx

Intel hardware
generation:
15.3 tokens/s
prompt processing (prefill):
513.4 tokens/s
quant:
Q4_K_M (GGUF)
kv:
Q8_0

Reported by the source; GPU count, offloading and concurrent requests can change these figures. Prompt-processing speed is input throughput, not time to first token. Check the full setup before comparing.

User benchmarks Qwen3.8-27B at 15.34 t/s generation and 513.39 t/s prompt processing on a single Intel Arc Pro B60. Setup is llama.cpp build b10452 with Vulkan backend, Q4_K_M GGUF weights and Q8_0 KV cache, full GPU offload with Flash Attention, at 512 tokens of context. A second run on two Arc Pro B60 cards gives 14.99 t/s decode and 507.93 t/s prefill at 512 tokens; dual-card prefill scales to 643.16 t/s at 1k, 718.37 t/s at 2k and 149.30 t/s at 64k, while decode stays near 15 t/s.

Oct 3, 2026

Qwen3.8 27B Swift

2× Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB · llama.cpp · 131,072 ctx

Tone: positiveIntel hardware
generation:
24.0 tokens/s
prompt processing (prefill):
609.5 tokens/s
quant:
Q4_K_M (GGUF)
kv:
Q8_0

Reported by the source; GPU count, offloading and concurrent requests can change these figures. Prompt-processing speed is input throughput, not time to first token. Check the full setup before comparing.

User reports Qwen3.8-27B at 24.00 tok/s decode on dual Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB (48GB total). Setup is llama.cpp build b11100 with SYCL F16 JIT, Q4_K_M GGUF, Q8_0 KV cache, 131072 context, and native embedded Q8_0 MTP draft speculative decoding. Prefill is 609.47 tok/s at 512 tokens, scaling to 925.39 tok/s at 4k and 570.24 tok/s at 128k. Stock non-MTP decode is 16.13 tok/s; live llama-server chat with MTP ranges 20.00-30.29 tok/s.

Oct 3, 2026
Tone: mixedIntel hardware
generation:
8.3 tokens/s
prompt processing (prefill):
112.6 tokens/s
quant:
Q4_K_XL (GGUF)

Reported by the source; GPU count, offloading and concurrent requests can change these figures. Prompt-processing speed is input throughput, not time to first token. Check the full setup before comparing.

User benchmarks Qwen3.5 35B-A3B at 8.34 t/s generation and 112.62 t/s prompt processing on an Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB. Setup is llama.cpp build 8175 with the SYCL backend, Q4_K_XL GGUF weights, full GPU offload (-ngl 100). User reports the card is ok for chat-length context on smaller models but slow for agentic tools like opencode/claude code, where initial prompt response can take 5-10 minutes. A comparison run of the same model on an RTX Pro 4500 Blackwell reached 133.47 t/s generation and 3807.62 t/s prompt processing.

Oct 3, 2026

Qwen3.8 27B

Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB · llama.cpp · 150,000 ctx

Tone: positiveIntel hardware
generation:
22.2 tokens/s
prompt processing (prefill):
245.5 tokens/s
quant:
Q4_K (GGUF)

Reported by the source; GPU count, offloading and concurrent requests can change these figures. Prompt-processing speed is input throughput, not time to first token. Check the full setup before comparing.

codingmathlong-context

User benchmarks a Qwen3.8-27B Ridge Intel Arc tuned GGUF on an Intel Arc Pro B60 24GB, reporting 22.23 tok/s pure autoregressive decode and 245.54 tok/s prompt prefill. Setup is llama.cpp with Q4_K weights, -ngl 99 and -fa on, on a single 24GB card. With embedded MTP speculative decoding the tuned Ridge build reaches 41.28 tok/s at 93.4% acceptance, and the DAS Lab IQ3_S tuned build reaches 41.88 tok/s at 92.9% acceptance. Stock IQ3_XXS decodes at 8.10 tok/s and stock Unsloth UD-Q4_K_S at 12.97 tok/s. At ~150k-token depth decode falls to 7.91 tok/s with DFlash2 and 7.21 tok/s with native MTP.

Sep 26, 2026
Showing 1–6 of 6
Page 1 of 1

Community benchmarks snapshot

Records by GPU

AMD Strix Halo 128GB294NVIDIA RTX 3090190NVIDIA RTX 5090134NVIDIA DGX Spark77M5 Max 48GB65NVIDIA RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell62NVIDIA RTX 5060 Ti 16GB58NVIDIA RTX 3060 12GB54AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 32GB50M4 Max 128GB49

Records by model

2211 total
Qwen3.81021
Qwen3.6238
DeepSeek V4 Flash147
Gemma 4144
Qwen3.597
Qwen353
other511

Records by engine

1645 total
llama.cpp875
vLLM189
MLX100
Strata70
Ollama62
other349

Use cases

coding 556agentic 357long-context 272tool-use 153vision 109summarization 53math 43creative-writing 37multilingual 23text-generation 9rp 8reasoning 3
coding556agentic357long-context272tool-use153vision109summarization53math43creative-writing37

Median generation t/s by GPU

On Qwen3.8 27B at 4-bit, plain single-GPU runs. Full ranking

RTX 509082RTX Pro 600067M5 Ultra 256GB50RX 7900 XTX48RTX 309036RTX 5090 Laptop 24GB34RTX 409032V100 32GB31Radeon AI PRO R9700 32GB30RX 7800 XT 16GB30

Prompt processing, same model

M5 Ultra 256GB1800RX 7900 XTX530RTX 3090561RTX 40901949V100 32GB941RTX 3080 20GB997Arc Pro B70512M1 Ultra 128GB153Arc Pro B60 24GB380M1 Max 32GB82

Reports by model size

Qwen3.8 27B566Qwen3.8 125B · 6B active371DeepSeek V4 Flash 284B · 13B active130Qwen3.6 35B · 3B active129Qwen3.6 27B72Gemma 4 26B · 4B active36GLM-5.3 320B · 18B active33DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 552B · 16B active28

Quants

Q4_K_M290UD-Q4_K_XL140NVFP4120Q8_0984-bit79Q4_K_XL71IQ4_XS70MXFP458IQ3_XXS52Q450