llamaperf

Local model performance on your hardware

Find which open-weight LLMs fit in your GPU or Mac and compare the speeds people report on setups like yours.

What runs on your hardware?

Pick your GPU or Mac, then read the speeds people reported on it, or estimate which models fit and how fast they run.

Free to use. No account needed. Memory estimates and community measurements are labelled separately.

Looking for a particular model?

Search for a model to see its reported speeds across GPUs and Macs.

Local model performance reports from the community

These are individual setups, not a controlled benchmark. Compare GPU count, quantization, context and offloading before comparing speeds. How to read a report →

GPU: NVIDIA RTX 2080 Ti 22GB (modded)
Compare setup details (1 active)

Exact recorded values. Context may be a configured limit; matching filters does not establish identical prompts, offloading or concurrency.

Tone: positiveNVIDIA hardware
generation:
69.0 tokens/s
quant:
UD-IQ4_XS (GGUF)
kv:
q8_0

Reported by the source; GPU count, offloading and concurrent requests can change these figures. Prompt-processing speed is shown only when the source reports it; generation speed cannot tell us time to first token. Check the full setup before comparing.

coding

User reports Qwen3.6-35B-A3B at 4-bit (UD-IQ4_XS) scoring 89.63% pass@1 on HumanEval at 69 tok/s on a single RTX 2080 Ti 22GB. Setup is llama.cpp with UD-IQ4_XS dynamic 4-bit (4.25 bpw), q8_0 KV cache, 16384 context, flash-attn on, whole model resident in VRAM with no offload. A routing patch (MoE expansion, 20 experts instead of 8 on layers 25-39) reached 90.85% pass@1 at 56 tok/s, a 19% decode speed cost; the user calls the +2 problems within statistical noise and notes the tests are original HumanEval, not EvalPlus.

Oct 7, 2026
Tone: positiveNVIDIA hardware
generation:
95.5 tokens/s
prompt processing (prefill):
465.8 tokens/s
quant:
Q4_K_P (GGUF)
kv:
Q8_0

Reported by the source; GPU count, offloading and concurrent requests can change these figures. Prompt-processing speed is input throughput, not time to first token. Check the full setup before comparing.

agenticlong-context

User reports Qwen3.6-35B-A3B at 95.5 t/s decode and 465.8 t/s prefill on a mixed three-GPU Turing setup of 2x CMP 50HX 10GB plus 1x RTX 2080 Ti 22GB. Setup is llama.cpp with a ported DP2A patch (PR #25834) and -fmad=false, Q4_K_P GGUF weights, Q8_0 KV cache, Flash Attention, 262144 context, MTP speculative decoding at --spec-draft-n-max 3, tensor split 1,1,2.5 with the RTX as tail stage, ubatch 448. Baseline DP4A gave 47.8 t/s decode and 372.7 t/s prefill; DP2A alone 54.0 t/s; adding -fmad=false 62.2 t/s. A repo-28k workload measured 405.4 t/s prefill and 82.3 t/s decode. An end-to-end rerun showed 91.4 t/s raw eval, 4% below the 95.5 reference. Context 368640 also works but quality beyond the trained window was not measured.

Oct 7, 2026
Tone: positiveNVIDIA hardware
generation:
44.1 tokens/s
quant:
IQ3_S (GGUF)
kv:
Q8_0
flash attention:
on

Reported by the source; GPU count, offloading and concurrent requests can change these figures. Prompt-processing speed is shown only when the source reports it; generation speed cannot tell us time to first token. Check the full setup before comparing.

long-contextvision

User reports Qwen3.8-27B-GSQ-RCO at 44.07 t/s decode on a hardware-modded RTX 2080 Ti 22GB, with 38~44 t/s quoted as the overall range. Setup is a llama.cpp fork (TurboQuant 4-bit + Adaptive KV Streaming) with IQ3_S weights, 256K context (262,144 tokens), Q8_0 key cache and turbo4 value cache, a 2048 MiB GPU staging pool, and MTP speculative decoding with 2 draft tokens. Needle tests at 8K/16K/32K gave 41.23, 39.00 and 34.84 t/s decode with 81-83% draft acceptance and 100% recall at 82% depth; a sustained 256K run gave 40.55 t/s at 89.17% acceptance. Peak VRAM was 18,619 MiB and GPU power peaked at 266.4 W.

Sep 28, 2026
Showing 1–3 of 3
Page 1 of 1

Community benchmarks snapshot

Records by GPU

AMD Strix Halo 128GB294NVIDIA RTX 3090190NVIDIA RTX 5090134NVIDIA DGX Spark77M5 Max 48GB65NVIDIA RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell62NVIDIA RTX 5060 Ti 16GB58NVIDIA RTX 3060 12GB54AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 32GB50M4 Max 128GB49

Records by model

2211 total
Qwen3.81021
Qwen3.6238
DeepSeek V4 Flash147
Gemma 4144
Qwen3.597
Qwen353
other511

Records by engine

1645 total
llama.cpp875
vLLM189
MLX100
Strata70
Ollama62
other349

Use cases

coding 556agentic 357long-context 272tool-use 153vision 109summarization 53math 43creative-writing 37multilingual 23text-generation 9rp 8reasoning 3
coding556agentic357long-context272tool-use153vision109summarization53math43creative-writing37

Median generation t/s by GPU

On Qwen3.8 27B at 4-bit, plain single-GPU runs. Full ranking

RTX 509082RTX Pro 600067M5 Ultra 256GB50RX 7900 XTX48RTX 309036RTX 5090 Laptop 24GB34RTX 409032V100 32GB31Radeon AI PRO R9700 32GB30RX 7800 XT 16GB30

Prompt processing, same model

M5 Ultra 256GB1800RX 7900 XTX530RTX 3090561RTX 40901949V100 32GB941RTX 3080 20GB997Arc Pro B70512M1 Ultra 128GB153Arc Pro B60 24GB380M1 Max 32GB82

Reports by model size

Qwen3.8 27B566Qwen3.8 125B · 6B active371DeepSeek V4 Flash 284B · 13B active130Qwen3.6 35B · 3B active129Qwen3.6 27B72Gemma 4 26B · 4B active36GLM-5.3 320B · 18B active33DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 552B · 16B active28

Quants

Q4_K_M290UD-Q4_K_XL140NVFP4120Q8_0984-bit79Q4_K_XL71IQ4_XS70MXFP458IQ3_XXS52Q450