llamaperf

Local model performance on your hardware

Find which open-weight LLMs fit in your GPU or Mac and compare the speeds people report on setups like yours.

Join the community

Follow along:XLinkedIn

What runs on your hardware?

Pick your GPU or Mac, then read the speeds people reported on it, or estimate which models fit and how fast they run.

Free to use. No account needed. Memory estimates and community measurements are labelled separately.

Looking for a particular model?

Search for a model to see its reported speeds across GPUs and Macs.

Local model performance reports from the community

These are individual setups, not a controlled benchmark. Compare GPU count, quantization, context and offloading before comparing speeds. How to read a report →

GPU: NVIDIA RTX 5080
Compare setup details (1 active)

Exact recorded values. Context may be a configured limit; matching filters does not establish identical prompts, offloading or concurrency.

Tone: positiveNVIDIA hardware
prompt processing (prefill):
5500.0 tokens/s
quant:
IQ3_S (GGUF)
codingagentic

User reports Qwen3.8 Flash-Next at up to 275 tok/s peak generation and 5500 tok/s prompt processing on a single RTX 5080 16GB with 64 GB DDR5-6400 and a Core Ultra 9 285K. Setup is the Strata fork Basalt with IQ3_S weights, run during a live opencode coding session. Code and tool calls peak at 275 tok/s while reasoning traces reach up to 190 tok/s; the user says the IQ3_S quant is very usable.

Oct 29, 2026
Tone: positiveNVIDIA hardware
generation:
150.0 tokens/s
prompt processing (prefill):
4396.0 tokens/s
quant:
IQ3_XXS (GGUF)
kv:
int8
agentic

User reports Qwen3.8-Flash-Next at 150 tok/s decode and about 4,400 tok/s prompt on a single RTX 5080 16 GB. Setup is Strata v0.2.1 with IQ3_XXS GGUF, int8 KV cache and 64K context, MTP speculation on, 15 CPU expert workers and an expert cache of 5,310 experts (8.61 GiB VRAM). Decode median 150.0 tok/s over 9 runs (126.7-170.2); fresh prompt runs gave 3,755 tok/s at 4K, 4,396 at 16K and 4,412 at 32K. The card was tuned with LACT (memory +6000, core capped 2850 MHz, 360 W), so stock cards may be slower.

Oct 21, 2026
Tone: positiveNVIDIA hardware
generation:
110.6 tokens/s
prompt processing (prefill):
2773.0 tokens/s
quant:
UD-Q4_K_XL (GGUF)
kv:
INT8
coding

User reports Qwen3.8-Flash-Next at 110.6 t/s generation and 2773 t/s prefill on two RTX 5080s with a Ryzen 9 9900X, using a custom Strata fork. Setup is Strata with UD-Q4_K_XL, 64K context, INT8 K/V, 8K prompt chunk, MTP on and expert adaptation on. Upstream v0.1.38 reached 78.1 t/s generation and 2016 t/s prefill with layer split, and 70.3 t/s generation and 1522 t/s prefill with the host peer tier. With static caches custom was about 26% ahead of upstream layer split (55 vs 44 t/s). Letting the second GPU compute experts during prompt processing doubled custom's 32K prefill (1366 to 2731 t/s), and a 16K chunk brought it to 3724 t/s. Putting the expert tier on the x8 PCIe card improved 4K prefill by 58% and 32K by 34%. The saved answer came from the custom fork, so it may favor its drafts.

Oct 3, 2026
Tone: positiveNVIDIA hardware
prompt processing (prefill):
1940.0 tokens/s
quant:
IQ2_XS (GGUF)
coding

User reports Qwen3.8-Flash-Next (Swift 1.5 IQ2_XS) at 143 tok/s code generation on an RTX 5080 + RTX 4060 Ti with 32 GB system RAM. Setup is a dual-GPU fork of the Strata engine at 256K context, with experts that don't fit in VRAM read from the SSD and a fine-tuned draft layer for speculative decoding. The same machine with the 5080 alone reached 29 tok/s code and 333 tok/s on a 32K prompt; the fork with both cards reached 1,940 tok/s on the 32K prompt. In real use with the Pi coding agent it peaks above 200 tok/s (209 so far) and a 150K-token context reads at about 1,850 tok/s. Perplexity was 7.24 vs upstream's 7.28.

Oct 3, 2026
Showing 1–4 of 4
Page 1 of 1

Community benchmarks snapshot

Records by GPU

AMD Strix Halo 128GB320NVIDIA RTX 3090219NVIDIA RTX 5090170NVIDIA DGX Spark91NVIDIA RTX 5060 Ti 16GB72NVIDIA RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell70M5 Max 48GB67NVIDIA RTX 3060 12GB65AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 32GB63NVIDIA RTX 409057

Records by model

2698 total
Qwen3.81272
Qwen3.6284
Gemma 4168
DeepSeek V4 Flash149
Qwen3.5121
Qwen375
other629

Records by engine

1980 total
llama.cpp1008
vLLM205
Strata150
MLX106
Ollama83
other428

Use cases

coding 737agentic 466long-context 342tool-use 207vision 137summarization 61math 57creative-writing 46multilingual 29rp 13text-generation 9reasoning 3
coding737agentic466long-context342tool-use207vision137summarization61math57creative-writing46

Median generation t/s by GPU

On Qwen3.8 27B at 4-bit, plain single-GPU runs. Full ranking

RTX 509080RTX Pro 600067M5 Ultra 256GB50RX 7900 XTX43RTX 409040RTX 309038RX 7800 XT 16GB35RTX 5090 Laptop 24GB34M3 Ultra 512GB32V100 32GB31

Prompt processing, same model

M5 Ultra 256GB1800RX 7900 XTX640RTX 40901949RTX 3090561M3 Ultra 512GB391V100 32GB941Radeon AI PRO R9700 32GB1287RTX 3080 20GB997Arc Pro B70512M1 Ultra 128GB153

Reports by model size

Qwen3.8 27B709Qwen3.8 125B · 6B active499Qwen3.6 35B · 3B active193DeepSeek V4 Flash 284B · 13B active132Qwen3.6 27B80Gemma 4 26B · 4B active59DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 552B · 16B active50GLM-5.3 320B · 18B active45

Quants

Q4_K_M341UD-Q4_K_XL157NVFP4148Q8_01074-bit91IQ4_XS76Q4_K_XL74MXFP466IQ3_XXS65IQ3_S59