llamaperf

Local model performance on your hardware

Find which open-weight LLMs fit in your GPU or Mac and compare the speeds people report on setups like yours.

Join the community

Follow along:XLinkedIn

What runs on your hardware?

Pick your GPU or Mac, then read the speeds people reported on it, or estimate which models fit and how fast they run.

Free to use. No account needed. Memory estimates and community measurements are labelled separately.

Looking for a particular model?

Search for a model to see its reported speeds across GPUs and Macs.

Local model performance reports from the community

These are individual setups, not a controlled benchmark. Compare GPU count, quantization, context and offloading before comparing speeds. How to read a report →

GPU: NVIDIA RTX 3090
Compare setup details (1 active)

Exact recorded values. Context may be a configured limit; matching filters does not establish identical prompts, offloading or concurrency.

Qwen3.6 27B

NVIDIA RTX 3090 · ik_llama.cpp · 200,000 ctx

Tone: positiveNVIDIA hardware
generation:
72.0 tokens/s
quant:
IQ4_KS (GGUF)
kv:
q4_0
coding

User benchmarks Qwen3.6 27B on a single RTX 3090 at an enforced 370 W power cap, comparing ik_llama.cpp with IQ4_KS against mainline llama.cpp with Q4_K_M. ik_llama.cpp reaches ~72 t/s code decode and ~60 t/s narrative decode versus ~58 and ~50 t/s for mainline, an 18-20% gain, with quality tied at 100-103/150 on an 8-pack and ~0.5 GB lower VRAM. Setup uses q4_0 KV cache, MTP n=2, -np 1, and a 200K context configuration that fills to ~183K tokens. A two-stage ngram plus MTP speculator on the same engine lifts code decode to ~98 t/s at the same power cap, with narrative flat at ~59 t/s. The user notes the earlier reported tie was a measurement artifact from a stale mainline container answering on the shared port, and that both engines are strongly power-sensitive between 230 W and 370 W.

Sep 27, 2026

Qwen3.6 27B

NVIDIA RTX 3090 · ik_llama.cpp · 156,000 ctx

Tone: positiveNVIDIA hardware
generation:
72.9 tokens/s
prompt processing (prefill):
1261.0 tokens/s
quant:
IQ4_KS (GGUF)
kv:
Q8
flash attention:
on
mtp (multi-token prediction):
on
coding

User reports Qwen3.6-27B-MTP-IQ4_KS.gguf at 72.9 t/s decode and 1261 tok/s prefill on an RTX 3090 24GB at 156k context. Setup is ik_llama.cpp with a q8_0/q8_0 KV cache, MTP, and vision on CPU. The user also tested llama.cpp and BeeLlama.

May 19, 2026
Showing 1–2 of 2
Page 1 of 1

Community benchmarks snapshot

Records by GPU

AMD Strix Halo 128GB320NVIDIA RTX 3090219NVIDIA RTX 5090170NVIDIA DGX Spark91NVIDIA RTX 5060 Ti 16GB72NVIDIA RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell71M5 Max 48GB67NVIDIA RTX 3060 12GB65AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 32GB63NVIDIA RTX 409057

Records by model

2701 total
Qwen3.81274
Qwen3.6284
Gemma 4168
DeepSeek V4 Flash149
Qwen3.5121
Qwen375
other630

Records by engine

1982 total
llama.cpp1008
vLLM206
Strata150
MLX106
Ollama84
other428

Use cases

coding 739agentic 467long-context 342tool-use 207vision 138summarization 61math 58creative-writing 46multilingual 29rp 13text-generation 9reasoning 3
coding739agentic467long-context342tool-use207vision138summarization61math58creative-writing46

Median generation t/s by GPU

On Qwen3.8 27B at 4-bit, plain single-GPU runs. Full ranking

RTX 509080RTX Pro 600067M5 Ultra 256GB50RX 7900 XTX43RTX 409040RTX 309038RX 7800 XT 16GB35RTX 5090 Laptop 24GB34M3 Ultra 512GB32V100 32GB31

Prompt processing, same model

M5 Ultra 256GB1800RX 7900 XTX640RTX 40901949RTX 3090561M3 Ultra 512GB391V100 32GB941Radeon AI PRO R9700 32GB1287RTX 3080 20GB997Arc Pro B70512M1 Ultra 128GB153

Reports by model size

Qwen3.8 27B709Qwen3.8 125B · 6B active501Qwen3.6 35B · 3B active193DeepSeek V4 Flash 284B · 13B active132Qwen3.6 27B80Gemma 4 26B · 4B active59DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 552B · 16B active50GLM-5.3 320B · 18B active45

Quants

Q4_K_M341UD-Q4_K_XL157NVFP4149Q8_01074-bit91IQ4_XS76Q4_K_XL74MXFP466IQ3_XXS65IQ3_S59