llamaperf

Local model performance on your hardware

Find which open-weight LLMs fit in your GPU or Mac and compare the speeds people report on setups like yours.

What runs on your hardware?

Pick your GPU or Mac, then read the speeds people reported on it, or estimate which models fit and how fast they run.

Free to use. No account needed. Memory estimates and community measurements are labelled separately.

Looking for a particular model?

Search for a model to see its reported speeds across GPUs and Macs.

Local model performance reports from the community

These are individual setups, not a controlled benchmark. Compare GPU count, quantization, context and offloading before comparing speeds. How to read a report →

GPU: Intel Arc Pro B70
Compare setup details (1 active)

Exact recorded values. Context may be a configured limit; matching filters does not establish identical prompts, offloading or concurrency.

Tone: positiveIntel hardware
generation:
70.0 tokens/s
prompt processing (prefill):
2800.0 tokens/s
quant:
W4A16-AutoRound (AutoRound)
kv:
FP8

Reported by the source; GPU count, offloading and concurrent requests can change these figures. Prompt-processing speed is input throughput, not time to first token. Check the full setup before comparing.

User reports Qwen3.8 Flash-Next at ~70 t/s generation and ~2800 t/s prefill on 4x Intel Arc Pro B70 GPUs. Setup is vLLM with Intel's W4A16-AutoRound quant, full 262K FP8 context, prefix caching, and concurrency=2. The user notes an alternative setup reached ~100 t/s generation but only ~1400 t/s prefill and 16-bit context, and considers the doubled prefill and context worth the ~30 t/s generation loss.

Oct 9, 2026

Qwen3.8 27B

Intel Arc Pro B70 · vLLM · 262,144 ctx

Tone: positiveIntel hardware
generation:
91.2 tokens/s
prompt processing (prefill):
2421.0 tokens/s
quant:
EXL3 4.00bpw (EXL3)
kv:
fp8

Reported by the source; GPU count, offloading and concurrent requests can change these figures. Prompt-processing speed is input throughput, not time to first token. Check the full setup before comparing.

codinglong-contextagentic

User reports Qwen3.8-27B EXL3 4.00bpw at 91.2 t/s decode (C1, prose) on one Intel Arc Pro B70 32GB. Setup is vLLM 0.26.1 XPU with EXL3 trellis quantization, fp8 KV cache, 262,144 context, MTP speculative decoding k=3, int8 prefill and oneDNN fused attention. Aggregate throughput scales to 365.2 t/s at C16; cold prefill is 2,421 t/s at 4K and 911 t/s at 254K. The same card with tuned llama.cpp SYCL Q4_K_M reaches 25.0 t/s at C1 and 999 t/s prefill at 4K.

Oct 8, 2026

Qwen3.8 27B

Intel Arc Pro B70 · vLLM · 128,000 ctx

Intel hardware
generation:
40-70 tokens/s

Reported by the source; GPU count, offloading and concurrent requests can change these figures. Prompt-processing speed is shown only when the source reports it; generation speed cannot tell us time to first token. Check the full setup before comparing.

User reports Qwen3.8 27B at 40-70 tokens per second on an Intel Arc Pro B70. Setup is vLLM with a Helm chart applying patches from the Intel Arc Pro B70 Inference Cookbook, at 128k context. The user gives the speed as a range depending on workload.

Oct 6, 2026

Qwen3.8 27B

Intel Arc Pro B70 · vLLM · 128,000 ctx

Tone: positiveIntel hardware
generation:
52.2 tokens/s
prompt processing (prefill):
763.0 tokens/s
quant:
INT4 (GPTQ)
kv:
FP8

Reported by the source; GPU count, offloading and concurrent requests can change these figures. Prompt-processing speed is input throughput, not time to first token. Check the full setup before comparing.

codingagenticvisiontool-use

User reports Qwen3.8-27B at a median 52.2 tok/s decode and 763 tok/s prefill at 111.8K tokens on an Intel Arc Pro B70 32GB. Setup is vLLM XPU with the GPTQ INT4 quant, MTP2 speculative decoding, an FP8 KV cache, and 128K context. Vision, tool calling, and agent tests pass. vLLM beats llama.cpp SYCL by about 1.8x. An MTP plus concurrency crash was fixed with max-num-seqs 1, and a prefix caching bug was patched.

Sep 7, 2026
Showing 1–4 of 4
Page 1 of 1

Community benchmarks snapshot

Records by GPU

AMD Strix Halo 128GB294NVIDIA RTX 3090190NVIDIA RTX 5090134NVIDIA DGX Spark77M5 Max 48GB65NVIDIA RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell62NVIDIA RTX 5060 Ti 16GB58NVIDIA RTX 3060 12GB54AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 32GB50M4 Max 128GB49

Records by model

2211 total
Qwen3.81021
Qwen3.6238
DeepSeek V4 Flash147
Gemma 4144
Qwen3.597
Qwen353
other511

Records by engine

1645 total
llama.cpp875
vLLM189
MLX100
Strata70
Ollama62
other349

Use cases

coding 556agentic 357long-context 272tool-use 153vision 109summarization 53math 43creative-writing 37multilingual 23text-generation 9rp 8reasoning 3
coding556agentic357long-context272tool-use153vision109summarization53math43creative-writing37

Median generation t/s by GPU

On Qwen3.8 27B at 4-bit, plain single-GPU runs. Full ranking

RTX 509082RTX Pro 600067M5 Ultra 256GB50RX 7900 XTX48RTX 309036RTX 5090 Laptop 24GB34RTX 409032V100 32GB31Radeon AI PRO R9700 32GB30RX 7800 XT 16GB30

Prompt processing, same model

M5 Ultra 256GB1800RX 7900 XTX530RTX 3090561RTX 40901949V100 32GB941RTX 3080 20GB997Arc Pro B70512M1 Ultra 128GB153Arc Pro B60 24GB380M1 Max 32GB82

Reports by model size

Qwen3.8 27B566Qwen3.8 125B · 6B active371DeepSeek V4 Flash 284B · 13B active130Qwen3.6 35B · 3B active129Qwen3.6 27B72Gemma 4 26B · 4B active36GLM-5.3 320B · 18B active33DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 552B · 16B active28

Quants

Q4_K_M290UD-Q4_K_XL140NVFP4120Q8_0984-bit79Q4_K_XL71IQ4_XS70MXFP458IQ3_XXS52Q450