llamaperf

Local model performance on your hardware

Find which open-weight LLMs fit in your GPU or Mac and compare the speeds people report on setups like yours.

What runs on your hardware?

Pick your GPU or Mac, then read the speeds people reported on it, or estimate which models fit and how fast they run.

Free to use. No account needed. Memory estimates and community measurements are labelled separately.

Looking for a particular model?

Search for a model to see its reported speeds across GPUs and Macs.

Local model performance reports from the community

These are individual setups, not a controlled benchmark. Compare GPU count, quantization, context and offloading before comparing speeds. How to read a report →

GPU: M5 Max 128GB
Compare setup details (1 active)

Exact recorded values. Context may be a configured limit; matching filters does not establish identical prompts, offloading or concurrency.

Apple hardware
generation:
144.4 tokens/s
quant:
MLX 4-bit affine, group 64 (MLX)

Reported by the source; GPU count, offloading and concurrent requests can change these figures. Prompt-processing speed is shown only when the source reports it; generation speed cannot tell us time to first token. Check the full setup before comparing.

User reports Qwen3 30B-A3B at 144.4 t/s on an M5 Max with 128GB unified memory. Setup is MLX with 4-bit affine quantization, group size 64, standard 8 routed experts per token, batch 1 with a 944-token prompt and 512 output tokens. The figure is the arithmetic mean of six fresh-process runs, ranging 144.10 to 145.01 t/s; an altered 6-expert routing gave 155.61 t/s but is not a standard-model result.

Oct 12, 2026
Apple hardware
generation:
130.6 tokens/s
prompt processing (prefill):
5402.4 tokens/s

Reported by the source; GPU count, offloading and concurrent requests can change these figures. Prompt-processing speed is input throughput, not time to first token. Check the full setup before comparing.

User reports Qwen3 30B-A3B at 130.628 t/s generation and 5402.434 t/s prompt processing on an Apple M5 Max with 128GB unified memory. Setup is MLX 0.32.2 with MLX-LM 0.31.3 on macOS 27.0; quantization, context length and KV cache settings are not reported. Figures come from a third-party hardware review (Tbreak, September 21, 2026), not a reproducible benchmark log; prompt and generated token counts are unknown.

Oct 8, 2026
Tone: positiveApple hardware
generation:
133.6 tokens/s
quant:
MLX-4bit (MLX)

Reported by the source; GPU count, offloading and concurrent requests can change these figures. Prompt-processing speed is shown only when the source reports it; generation speed cannot tell us time to first token. Check the full setup before comparing.

agenticcoding

User reports Nex-N2.5-mini at 133.6 t/s on an Apple M5 Max. Setup is MLX with the MLX-4bit quant, using temperature 0.7, top_p 0.95, top_k 40, and reasoning_effort high. User calls the generation speed and prompt processing really good, the memory footprint okay, and the quality good across the board, and plans to use it for agents and possibly coding.

Sep 12, 2026

Qwen3.6 27B

M5 Max 128GB · MLX · 128,000 ctx

Tone: positiveApple hardware
generation:
17.2 tokens/s
prompt processing (prefill):
706.0 tokens/s
quant:
Q8

Reported by the source; GPU count, offloading and concurrent requests can change these figures. Prompt-processing speed is input throughput, not time to first token. Check the full setup before comparing.

coding

User benchmarks a 128 GB M5 Max MacBook Pro across multiple models, selecting Qwen 3.6 27B MLX Q8 as the primary one. Other models tested include Gemma 4, MiniMax M2.7 and DeepSeek V4 Flash. The user is enthusiastic about local AI.

Sep 7, 2026

Qwen3.6 27B

M5 Max 128GB · MLX · 290,000 ctx

Tone: mixedApple hardware
generation:
5-6 tokens/s
prompt processing (prefill):
160.0 tokens/s
quant:
Q8 (MLX)

Reported by the source; GPU count, offloading and concurrent requests can change these figures. Prompt-processing speed is input throughput, not time to first token. Check the full setup before comparing.

long-context

User reports 160 t/s prefill and 5-6 t/s generation on an M5 Max 128GB with Qwen 3.6 27B Q8 MLX at 290k context. GPU utilization sits at only 36-50%. The user finds the generation rate low against an expected 8-14 t/s and asks others for comparison.

May 2, 2026
Showing 1–5 of 5
Page 1 of 1

Community benchmarks snapshot

Records by GPU

AMD Strix Halo 128GB294NVIDIA RTX 3090190NVIDIA RTX 5090134NVIDIA DGX Spark77M5 Max 48GB65NVIDIA RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell62NVIDIA RTX 5060 Ti 16GB58NVIDIA RTX 3060 12GB54AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 32GB50M4 Max 128GB49

Records by model

2211 total
Qwen3.81021
Qwen3.6238
DeepSeek V4 Flash147
Gemma 4144
Qwen3.597
Qwen353
other511

Records by engine

1645 total
llama.cpp875
vLLM189
MLX100
Strata70
Ollama62
other349

Use cases

coding 556agentic 357long-context 272tool-use 153vision 109summarization 53math 43creative-writing 37multilingual 23text-generation 9rp 8reasoning 3
coding556agentic357long-context272tool-use153vision109summarization53math43creative-writing37

Median generation t/s by GPU

On Qwen3.8 27B at 4-bit, plain single-GPU runs. Full ranking

RTX 509082RTX Pro 600067M5 Ultra 256GB50RX 7900 XTX48RTX 309036RTX 5090 Laptop 24GB34RTX 409032V100 32GB31Radeon AI PRO R9700 32GB30RX 7800 XT 16GB30

Prompt processing, same model

M5 Ultra 256GB1800RX 7900 XTX530RTX 3090561RTX 40901949V100 32GB941RTX 3080 20GB997Arc Pro B70512M1 Ultra 128GB153Arc Pro B60 24GB380M1 Max 32GB82

Reports by model size

Qwen3.8 27B566Qwen3.8 125B · 6B active371DeepSeek V4 Flash 284B · 13B active130Qwen3.6 35B · 3B active129Qwen3.6 27B72Gemma 4 26B · 4B active36GLM-5.3 320B · 18B active33DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 552B · 16B active28

Quants

Q4_K_M290UD-Q4_K_XL140NVFP4120Q8_0984-bit79Q4_K_XL71IQ4_XS70MXFP458IQ3_XXS52Q450