llamaperf

Local model performance on your hardware

Find which open-weight LLMs fit in your GPU or Mac and compare the speeds people report on setups like yours.

Join the community

Follow along:XLinkedIn

What runs on your hardware?

Pick your GPU or Mac, then read the speeds people reported on it, or estimate which models fit and how fast they run.

Free to use. No account needed. Memory estimates and community measurements are labelled separately.

Looking for a particular model?

Search for a model to see its reported speeds across GPUs and Macs.

Local model performance reports from the community

These are individual setups, not a controlled benchmark. Compare GPU count, quantization, context and offloading before comparing speeds. How to read a report →

GPU: AMD RX 7800 XT 16GB
Compare setup details

Exact recorded values. Context may be a configured limit; matching filters does not establish identical prompts, offloading or concurrency.

Tiel-Coder 35B (3B active)

AMD RX 7800 XT 16GB · shura.cpp

Tone: positiveAMD hardware
generation:
75.0 tokens/s
coding

User reports Tiel-Coder-35B-A3B at around 75 tok/s decode on short prompts on an RX 7800 XT 16GB, dropping to about 49 tok/s at 100K context. Setup is shura.cpp, a llama.cpp fork with an automatic VRAM governor that keeps 1.5 GiB of VRAM free for the desktop, on a Ryzen 5 5600 with 32GB DDR4-3200 under Fedora and ROCm 7.2.4. Experts are cached on the GPU with the rest in system RAM. Prefill improved 16.3% at 28K context and 7.9% at 100K over the previous build, with short-context decode basically unchanged. KL divergence was 0.0346 against a 0.0343 self-comparison baseline. A 40-minute stress test of 384 requests mixing 28-34K prompts had no failed requests. Only AMD gfx1101 with ROCm was benchmarked; CUDA builds compile but are untested.

Oct 28, 2026
Tone: positiveAMD hardware
generation:
40-45 tokens/s
quant:
GSQ RCO

User asks whether any engines are optimized for consumer AMD hardware, noting most specialized engines target Nvidia. They report running Swift 1.5 GSQ RCO at about 40-45 TPS on an RX 7800 XT, with no engine named. The figure is given only as a range, and the user says they are happy with the setup and wonders how much more can be squeezed out of the hardware.

Oct 24, 2026
Tone: mixedAMD hardware
generation:
40.0 tokens/s
quant:
4bit

User reports Qwen3.8 27B at 4bit running at around 40 t/s on an RX 7800 XT 16GB with 32GB RAM, at a max context of 120k. User is considering upgrading to a used RX 7900 XTX for €900 to reach 250k context and replace AI subscriptions, but finds the current quality not great. User is not interested in Qwen3.8 Flash-Next.

Oct 14, 2026
AMD hardware
generation:
35.0 tokens/s
quant:
UD-Q5_K_M (GGUF)
codingagentic

User reports Qwen3.6-35B-A3B at 35 t/s on an RX 7800 XT 16GB, with a Ryzen 5 7600X and 32GB DDR5. Setup is llama.cpp with UD-Q5_K_M (about 25GB), which spills past the 16GB card. User asks whether to swap to a used 7900 XTX 24GB or add a used 7600 XT 16GB, and requests real t/s numbers for either setup under Vulkan or ROCm.

Oct 12, 2026
Tone: mixedAMD hardware
generation:
64.9 tokens/s
prompt processing (prefill):
985.8 tokens/s
quant:
IQ3_XXS (GGUF)
kv:
int8
coding

User reports Qwen3.8-Flash-Next at 64.9 tok/s aggregate decode and 985.8 tok/s prefill on an RX 7800 XT 16GB. Setup is Strata 0.1.42 with IQ3_XXS and int8 KV cache, 39.97 GiB of expert weights in host RAM and 5,048 experts (8.19 GiB) cached in VRAM. MTP was enabled with --spec 4. The 64.9 tok/s is aggregate decode over 54 requests; median per-request was 66.4 tok/s with a 56.1-82.8 tok/s range. Other fresh-prompt prefill readings were 912.9 tok/s at 6,731 tokens, 1,004.6 tok/s at 76,599 tokens, 791.0 tok/s at 116,392 tokens and 509.8 tok/s at 38,790 tokens. Across all 61 tail-skip requests aggregate decode was 52.7 tok/s. An informal comparison gave 50.8 tok/s without route tail skip and 56.7 tok/s with it.

Oct 12, 2026
Tone: mixedAMD hardware
generation:
110.0 tokens/s
quant:
UD-IQ3_XXS (GGUF)
kv:
turbo4

User reports Qwen3.6-35B-A3B at ~110 t/s on an AMD RX 7800 XT 16GB with MTP and turbo4 KV cache at 32K context. Setup is a NJannasch llama.cpp mtp-turboquant fork on ROCm 6.4.0 (gfx1101) with UD-IQ3_XXS GGUF, turbo4 KV cache, --spec-type draft-mtp, and --reasoning-budget 512. MTP acceptance was 86% at 32K context; turbo4 KV saved ~470 MB vs f16 at 32K. The user warns that a silent CPU fallback can drop generation to 5-10 t/s and that gfx1032 cards crash with this fork.

Oct 7, 2026
Tone: negativeAMD hardware
generation:
1.5 tokens/s
quant:
Q4_K_M (GGUF)

User reports Llama 3.1 8B at 1.5 t/s on an AMD RX 7800 XT under Ollama, compared with 65 t/s in LM Studio on the same machine. Setup is Ollama 0.4.7 on Windows with the Q4_K_M quant, Adrenalin Edition 24.10.1 drivers. The user asks whether the gap is their setup or an Ollama limitation.

Oct 4, 2026

Qwen3.8 27B

AMD RX 7800 XT 16GB · llama.cpp · 100,096 ctx

Tone: positiveAMD hardware
generation:
30.0 tokens/s
quant:
UD-IQ4_XS (GGUF)
kv:
q8_0/q5_1

User reports Qwen 3.8 27B at ~30 t/s decode on an RX 7800 XT 16GB. Setup is llama.cpp with Vulkan, UD-IQ4_XS GGUF quant, q8_0/q5_1 KV cache, 100096 context, no MTP, single request, full GPU offload. User shares the setup because many believe Qwen 3.8 27B is infeasible on 16GB VRAM.

Sep 29, 2026
Showing 1–8 of 8
Page 1 of 1

Community benchmarks snapshot

Records by GPU

AMD Strix Halo 128GB320NVIDIA RTX 3090219NVIDIA RTX 5090170NVIDIA DGX Spark91NVIDIA RTX 5060 Ti 16GB72NVIDIA RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell70M5 Max 48GB67NVIDIA RTX 3060 12GB65AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 32GB63NVIDIA RTX 409057

Records by model

2698 total
Qwen3.81272
Qwen3.6284
Gemma 4168
DeepSeek V4 Flash149
Qwen3.5121
Qwen375
other629

Records by engine

1980 total
llama.cpp1008
vLLM205
Strata150
MLX106
Ollama83
other428

Use cases

coding 737agentic 466long-context 342tool-use 207vision 137summarization 61math 57creative-writing 46multilingual 29rp 13text-generation 9reasoning 3
coding737agentic466long-context342tool-use207vision137summarization61math57creative-writing46

Median generation t/s by GPU

On Qwen3.8 27B at 4-bit, plain single-GPU runs. Full ranking

RTX 509080RTX Pro 600067M5 Ultra 256GB50RX 7900 XTX43RTX 409040RTX 309038RX 7800 XT 16GB35RTX 5090 Laptop 24GB34M3 Ultra 512GB32V100 32GB31

Prompt processing, same model

M5 Ultra 256GB1800RX 7900 XTX640RTX 40901949RTX 3090561M3 Ultra 512GB391V100 32GB941Radeon AI PRO R9700 32GB1287RTX 3080 20GB997Arc Pro B70512M1 Ultra 128GB153

Reports by model size

Qwen3.8 27B709Qwen3.8 125B · 6B active499Qwen3.6 35B · 3B active193DeepSeek V4 Flash 284B · 13B active132Qwen3.6 27B80Gemma 4 26B · 4B active59DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 552B · 16B active50GLM-5.3 320B · 18B active45

Quants

Q4_K_M341UD-Q4_K_XL157NVFP4148Q8_01074-bit91IQ4_XS76Q4_K_XL74MXFP466IQ3_XXS65IQ3_S59