llamaperf

Local model performance on your hardware

Find which open-weight LLMs fit in your GPU or Mac and compare the speeds people report on setups like yours.

Join the community

Follow along:XLinkedIn

What runs on your hardware?

Pick your GPU or Mac, then read the speeds people reported on it, or estimate which models fit and how fast they run.

Free to use. No account needed. Memory estimates and community measurements are labelled separately.

Looking for a particular model?

Search for a model to see its reported speeds across GPUs and Macs.

Local model performance reports from the community

These are individual setups, not a controlled benchmark. Compare GPU count, quantization, context and offloading before comparing speeds. How to read a report →

GPU: NVIDIA P102-100
Compare setup details

Exact recorded values. Context may be a configured limit; matching filters does not establish identical prompts, offloading or concurrency.

Tone: mixedNVIDIA hardware
generation:
10.9 tokens/s
prompt processing (prefill):
19.7 tokens/s
quant:
IQ3_XXS (GGUF)

User compares mainline llama.cpp against ik_llama.cpp on a hybrid 4-GPU rig with a Qwen3.8 Flash-Next 177B Uncensored IQ3_XXS model at 32k context, 35 layers offloaded to GPU and 13 on the CPU. Mainline reaches 19.70 t/s prompt eval and 10.86 t/s generation with 2,490 CUDA graphs reused; ik_llama.cpp drops to 5.48 t/s prompt eval and 8.43 t/s generation with no CUDA graphs and context checkpoints during generation. User asks whether ik_llama.cpp's advantage applies only to CPU or single-GPU setups, and whether its threadpool struggles with pipelined layer splits across heterogeneous GPUs over PCIe.

Oct 7, 2026

Qwen3.6 35B (3B active)

2× NVIDIA P102-100 · llama.cpp · 32,768 ctx

Tone: positiveNVIDIA hardware
generation:
23.5 tokens/s
prompt processing (prefill):
432.3 tokens/s
quant:
IQ4_XS (GGUF)

User reports Qwen3.6-35B-A3B at 23.49 tokens per second per user with 3 concurrent users on two NVIDIA P102-100 cards of 10 GB each. Setup is llama.cpp server with the UD-IQ4_XS GGUF, all layers on the two cards, 96K context giving 32K to each user, with prompt processing at 432.28 tokens per second. The user gives the end result as 70tk/s and 1,257 PP across the three users, from $100 worth of cards.

Aug 28, 2026
Showing 1–2 of 2
Page 1 of 1

Community benchmarks snapshot

Records by GPU

AMD Strix Halo 128GB317NVIDIA RTX 3090217NVIDIA RTX 5090163NVIDIA DGX Spark88NVIDIA RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell70NVIDIA RTX 5060 Ti 16GB68M5 Max 48GB67NVIDIA RTX 3060 12GB64AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 32GB61NVIDIA RTX 409057

Records by model

2624 total
Qwen3.81235
Qwen3.6275
Gemma 4166
DeepSeek V4 Flash149
Qwen3.5118
Qwen375
other606

Records by engine

1933 total
llama.cpp994
vLLM202
Strata138
MLX106
Ollama81
other412

Use cases

coding 702agentic 444long-context 331tool-use 193vision 132summarization 61math 53creative-writing 44multilingual 28rp 13text-generation 9reasoning 3
coding702agentic444long-context331tool-use193vision132summarization61math53creative-writing44

Median generation t/s by GPU

On Qwen3.8 27B at 4-bit, plain single-GPU runs. Full ranking

RTX 509073RTX Pro 600067M5 Ultra 256GB50RX 7900 XTX43RTX 409040RTX 309038RX 7800 XT 16GB35RTX 5090 Laptop 24GB34M3 Ultra 512GB32V100 32GB31

Prompt processing, same model

M5 Ultra 256GB1800RX 7900 XTX640RTX 40901949RTX 3090561M3 Ultra 512GB391V100 32GB941Radeon AI PRO R9700 32GB1287RTX 3080 20GB997Arc Pro B70512M1 Ultra 128GB153

Reports by model size

Qwen3.8 27B691Qwen3.8 125B · 6B active483Qwen3.6 35B · 3B active185DeepSeek V4 Flash 284B · 13B active132Qwen3.6 27B79Gemma 4 26B · 4B active59DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 552B · 16B active45GLM-5.3 320B · 18B active43

Quants

Q4_K_M335UD-Q4_K_XL155NVFP4145Q8_01074-bit89IQ4_XS75Q4_K_XL74MXFP465IQ3_XXS61Q455