llamaperf

Local model performance on your hardware

Find which open-weight LLMs fit in your GPU or Mac and compare the speeds people report on setups like yours.

Join the community

Follow along:XLinkedIn

What runs on your hardware?

Pick your GPU or Mac, then read the speeds people reported on it, or estimate which models fit and how fast they run.

Free to use. No account needed. Memory estimates and community measurements are labelled separately.

Looking for a particular model?

Search for a model to see its reported speeds across GPUs and Macs.

Local model performance reports from the community

These are individual setups, not a controlled benchmark. Compare GPU count, quantization, context and offloading before comparing speeds. How to read a report →

GPU: NVIDIA RTX 5070 Ti Laptop 12GB
Compare setup details

Exact recorded values. Context may be a configured limit; matching filters does not establish identical prompts, offloading or concurrency.

Tone: positiveNVIDIA hardware
generation:
51.0 tokens/s
prompt processing (prefill):
1500.0 tokens/s
quant:
IQ3_XXS (GGUF)
kv:
8bit

User reports Qwen3.8 Flash-Next at 51 t/s generation and 1500 t/s prompt processing on an RTX 5070 Ti Laptop 12GB with 64GB RAM. Setup is the Strata engine with an IQ3_XXS GGUF quant and 8-bit KV cache, using 131k context. The model was partially offloaded, using 11GB VRAM and 56GB system RAM. The generation speed was measured at 43k context depth. The user compares this to stock llama.cpp, which reached 23 t/s generation and 100 t/s prompt processing with the same quant.

Sep 30, 2026
Tone: positiveNVIDIA hardware
generation:
9-11 tokens/s
prompt processing (prefill):
400-550 tokens/s
quant:
UD_Q4_K_XL (GGUF)
kv:
q8_0
codingagenticlong-context

User reports Qwen 3.8 27B at ~9-11 t/s decode and 400-550 t/s prefill on an RTX 5070 Ti Laptop 12GB. Setup is llama.cpp with UD_Q4_K_XL quant, q8_0 KV cache, 98304 context, draft-mtp speculative decoding, and FFN weights offloaded to CPU. The user notes reasoning verbosity blows past 100K tokens in planning, and with Magic Context the session scaled past 3.7M total processed tokens.

Sep 26, 2026
Tone: positiveNVIDIA hardware
generation:
35.0 tokens/s
prompt processing (prefill):
475.0 tokens/s
quant:
IQ1_S (GGUF)

User reports Qwen3.8 Flash-Next at ~35 t/s decode and ~475 t/s prefill on an RTX 5070 Ti Laptop 12GB with 60 GB system RAM. Setup is the Flyweight engine with an IQ1_S GGUF, running MoE experts on CPU or split with a hot set cached on the GPU. Other measurements on the same laptop: Qwen3.8 27B IQ2_XXS at ~40 t/s, DeepSeek-V4-Flash at 6-7 t/s, and Z-Image 1024x1024 in ~15 s with a 35B model loaded alongside.

Sep 18, 2026

Qwen3.8 27B

NVIDIA RTX 5070 Ti Laptop 12GB · Unsloth Studio · 8,192 ctx

Tone: positiveNVIDIA hardware
generation:
4.5 tokens/s
prompt processing (prefill):
20-27 tokens/s
quant:
UD-Q4_K_XL
kv:
Q8
mtp (multi-token prediction):
on
coding

User reports Qwen3.8-27B at around 4.5 tok/s on an RTX 5070 Ti Laptop GPU with 12GB VRAM and 32GB system RAM. Setup is Unsloth Studio with UD-Q4_K_XL (roughly 17.9GB), 8K context, Q8 KV cache, flash attention, one parallel slot and MTP speculative decoding with draft max 2. Around 10,978 MiB stays in VRAM and the rest is offloaded to the CPU. A longer response ran at 3.26 tok/s, a short factual one at 4.42 tok/s and a Python coding one at 4.53 tok/s, with prompt processing around 20-27 tok/s. Draft-token acceptance was around 78-83%.

Sep 7, 2026
Tone: positiveNVIDIA hardware
generation:
59.0 tokens/s
prompt processing (prefill):
155.8 tokens/s
quant:
Q4_K_M (GGUF)
kv:
Q8
codingmath

User compares Qwen3.8 27B dense at Q2 and Q3 against Qwen3.6 35B-A3B MoE on 12 GB of VRAM. The MoE was fastest and passed a sanity test, while dense Q3 ran at 7.5-9.1 t/s. The user prefers the MoE for local use.

Sep 7, 2026

Qwen3.8 27B

NVIDIA RTX 5070 Ti Laptop 12GB · llama.cpp · 262,144 ctx

Tone: positiveNVIDIA hardware
generation:
5.0 tokens/s
quant:
Q4_K_XL (GGUF)
kv:
Q8

User reports Qwen 3.8 27B UD Q4_K_XL on an RTX 5070 Ti Mobile 12GB with llama.cpp, at roughly 1.5-5 t/s in a context-prioritized configuration and roughly 9-11.5 t/s in a speed-prioritized one. Setup uses a q8_0 KV cache, with context at 262144 in the first configuration and 98304 in the second. User praises the model's capability and instruction following.

Sep 7, 2026
Showing 1–6 of 6
Page 1 of 1

Community benchmarks snapshot

Records by GPU

AMD Strix Halo 128GB313NVIDIA RTX 3090217NVIDIA RTX 5090161NVIDIA DGX Spark87NVIDIA RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell70NVIDIA RTX 5060 Ti 16GB67M5 Max 48GB67NVIDIA RTX 3060 12GB63AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 32GB61NVIDIA RTX 409055

Records by model

2585 total
Qwen3.81216
Qwen3.6274
Gemma 4165
DeepSeek V4 Flash148
Qwen3.5116
Qwen371
other595

Records by engine

1909 total
llama.cpp983
vLLM202
Strata132
MLX106
Ollama79
other407

Use cases

coding 686agentic 435long-context 324tool-use 189vision 126summarization 61math 51creative-writing 43multilingual 26rp 12text-generation 9reasoning 3
coding686agentic435long-context324tool-use189vision126summarization61math51creative-writing43

Median generation t/s by GPU

On Qwen3.8 27B at 4-bit, plain single-GPU runs. Full ranking

RTX 509073RTX Pro 600067M5 Ultra 256GB50RX 7900 XTX43RTX 409040RTX 309038RX 7800 XT 16GB35RTX 5090 Laptop 24GB34M3 Ultra 512GB32V100 32GB31

Prompt processing, same model

M5 Ultra 256GB1800RX 7900 XTX640RTX 40901949RTX 3090561M3 Ultra 512GB391V100 32GB941Radeon AI PRO R9700 32GB1287RTX 3080 20GB997Arc Pro B70512M1 Ultra 128GB153

Reports by model size

Qwen3.8 27B683Qwen3.8 125B · 6B active472Qwen3.6 35B · 3B active184DeepSeek V4 Flash 284B · 13B active131Qwen3.6 27B79Gemma 4 26B · 4B active59GLM-5.3 320B · 18B active42DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 552B · 16B active42

Quants

Q4_K_M332UD-Q4_K_XL153NVFP4144Q8_01054-bit87IQ4_XS75Q4_K_XL74MXFP465IQ3_XXS61Q454