llamaperf

Local model performance on your hardware

Find which open-weight LLMs fit in your GPU or Mac and compare the speeds people report on setups like yours.

What runs on your hardware?

Pick your GPU or Mac, then read the speeds people reported on it, or estimate which models fit and how fast they run.

Free to use. No account needed. Memory estimates and community measurements are labelled separately.

Local model performance reports from the community

These are individual setups, not a controlled benchmark. Compare GPU count, quantization, context and offloading before comparing speeds. How to read a report →

GPU: NVIDIA RTX 3080 10GB
Compare setup details

Exact recorded values. Context may be a configured limit; matching filters does not establish identical prompts, offloading or concurrency.

Qwen3.8 27B

NVIDIA RTX 3080 10GB · Unsloth · 44,000 ctx

reported speed:
20-25 tokens/s generation
quant:
IQ3_XXS (GGUF)

Reported by the source; GPU count, offloading and concurrent requests can change this figure. Check the full setup before comparing.

agenticcoding

User asks whether replacing a GTX 1070 with an RTX 3060 12GB is worthwhile for local LLMs and agentic coding. Current setup is an RTX 3080 10GB plus GTX 1070 8GB, Ryzen 5 5600X, 32GB RAM. User reports running Qwen3.8 27B IQ3_XXS at about 20-25 tokens/s with 44K context using Unsloth, and wants at least 128K context. The 3060 upgrade is a purchase question, not a measured run; no throughput figure is reported for the proposed card.

Oct 5, 2026

Bonsai 2 27B

NVIDIA RTX 3080 10GB · llama.cpp · 32,768 ctx

reported speed:
52.2 tokens/s generation · 1210.6 tokens/s prompt processing
quant:
PTQ1_0 (GGUF)
kv:
q8_0

Reported by the source; GPU count, offloading and concurrent requests can change this figure. Check the full setup before comparing.

coding

User reports Bonsai 2 27B PTQ1_0 at 52.18 t/s generation and 1210.6 t/s prefill on an RTX 3080 10GB. Setup is llama.cpp (fork build prism-b10735-842b188, CUDA 12.8) with PTQ1_0 quant and q8_0 KV cache at 32K context, single card, batch 1, depth 0, -ngl 99 -fa on. User also benchmarks PQ2_0 at 61.38 t/s and Qwen3.8-27B-UD-IQ2_XXS at 44.46 t/s on the same card, and reports a context ladder up to 160K q4_0 at 9627 MiB peak VRAM. A LiveCodeBench v6 comparison gives PTQ1_0 32/50 pass@1 versus 16/50 for IQ2_XXS and 28/50 for PQ2_0.

Sep 28, 2026
Showing 1–2 of 2
Page 1 of 1

Community benchmarks snapshot

Records by GPU

NVIDIA RTX 3090165NVIDIA RTX 5090114AMD Strix Halo 128GB82NVIDIA DGX Spark57NVIDIA RTX 5060 Ti 16GB53NVIDIA RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell51NVIDIA RTX 3060 12GB46AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 32GB43NVIDIA RTX 409037NVIDIA RTX 5070 Ti30

Records by model

1397 total
Qwen3.8781
Qwen3.6170
DeepSeek V4 Flash121
Gemma 461
Qwen3.529
Qwen322
other213

Records by engine

1074 total
llama.cpp570
vLLM153
Strata47
NInfer40
Ollama34
other230

Use cases

coding 453agentic 287long-context 208tool-use 120vision 85summarization 45math 36creative-writing 30multilingual 19text-generation 9rp 6reasoning 3
coding453agentic287long-context208tool-use120vision85summarization45math36creative-writing30

Median t/s by GPU

On Qwen3.8 27B at 4-bit, plain single-GPU runs. Full ranking

RTX 509093RTX Pro 600067M5 Ultra 256GB50RX 7900 XTX41RTX 309036V100 32GB33RTX 409032RX 7800 XT 16GB30RTX 5090 Laptop 24GB30Radeon AI PRO R9700 32GB29

Reports by model size

Qwen3.8 27B468Qwen3.8 125B · 6B active283DeepSeek V4 Flash 284B · 13B active102Qwen3.6 35B · 3B active100Qwen3.6 27B68Gemma 4 26B · 4B active25DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 552B · 16B active22GLM-5.3 320B · 18B active18

Quants

Q4_K_M119NVFP495IQ4_XS57Q4_K_XL56UD-Q4_K_XL49IQ3_XXS38Q437Q8_0354-bit24Q6_K23