llamaperf

Local model performance on your hardware

Find which open-weight LLMs fit in your GPU or Mac and compare the speeds people report on setups like yours.

Join the community

Follow along:XLinkedIn

What runs on your hardware?

Pick your GPU or Mac, then read the speeds people reported on it, or estimate which models fit and how fast they run.

Free to use. No account needed. Memory estimates and community measurements are labelled separately.

Looking for a particular model?

Search for a model to see its reported speeds across GPUs and Macs.

Local model performance reports from the community

These are individual setups, not a controlled benchmark. Compare GPU count, quantization, context and offloading before comparing speeds. How to read a report →

GPU: AMD MI50 32GB
Compare setup details

Exact recorded values. Context may be a configured limit; matching filters does not establish identical prompts, offloading or concurrency.

Tone: positiveAMD hardware
generation:
23.0 tokens/s
prompt processing (prefill):
170.0 tokens/s
quant:
IQ1_M/IQ2_XS/IQ2_XXS (IST-DAS 2.00bpw) (GGUF)

User reports DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash at about 23 tok/s decode and ~170 tok/s prefill on a single AMD MI50 32GB. Setup is Strata with the IST-DAS 2.00bpw GGUF set (IQ1_M/IQ2_XS/IQ2_XXS experts), a separate 111 GB Engram table and the DSpark drafter, about 258 GB on disk, with 62 GB RAM and 24 CPU threads. Only ~23.6 GB of the 132 GB of experts fit on the card; the rest runs from a 46 GB RAM store and the SSD, so weights are offloaded. Decode was 15.8 tok/s by default, 16.7 with 24 CPU threads, 19.6 with --experts 5, and 22.6-23 with DSpark on at 0.65 confidence. Prefill was measured on a 7.5K-token prompt; short ~30-token prompts give ~30-40 tok/s. Contexts were tested only up to 8K with one request at a time, and the gfx906 support is a set of local patches, not upstream.

Oct 29, 2026

Qwen2.5 1.5B

AMD MI50 32GB · vLLM · 8,192 ctx

AMD hardware
generation:
32.1 tokens/s
quant:
FP16 (safetensors)

User reports Qwen2.5-1.5B-Instruct at 32.14 tok/s single-stream on an AMD Instinct MI50 32GB with vLLM. Setup is vLLM with unquantized FP16 weights on one MI50, one request, no speculative decoding, enforce-eager, ROCm flash attention, max model length 8192, in an unprivileged Proxmox LXC container. Under continuous batching aggregate throughput rises to 63.8 tok/s at 2 streams, 238.9 at 8 and 422.8 at 32. llama.cpp with 4-bit GGUF weights on the same card gave 31.25 tok/s single-stream and stayed near 31 at every concurrency. Qwen2.5-0.5B reached 648.2 tok/s aggregate.

Oct 8, 2026
Tone: positiveAMD hardware
generation:
20.2 tokens/s
prompt processing (prefill):
176.9 tokens/s
quant:
Q6_K (GGUF)

User benchmarks Swift-Qwen3.8-27B-Uncensored-MTP at 20.21 t/s generation and 176.86 t/s prompt processing on dual AMD Radeon Instinct MI50 (32GB combined VRAM) under ROCm 10.2, compared against 18.35 t/s and 149.30 t/s under Vulkan Mesa 26.2. Setup is llama.cpp (llama-b11401 for ROCm, llama-b11382 for Vulkan) with Q6_K GGUF weights, both GPUs power limited to 145 watts. ROCm shows +10.14% generation and +18.46% prefill over Vulkan for this model. Across the full nine-model sweep, ROCm gains up to +62.74% on generation but regresses on MoE prefill by up to -15.98%, with high variance (e.g. ±102.56 on Qwen3.5MoE Q4_K prefill).

Oct 6, 2026
AMD hardware
generation:
63.0 tokens/s
prompt processing (prefill):
1224.1 tokens/s
quant:
Q4_0 (GGUF)
kv:
Q8_0

User benchmarks Qwen3-30B-A3B-Thinking-2507-Q4_0 on an AMD MI50 using a specialized llama.cpp-gfx906 fork with flash attention and Q8_0 KV cache quantization. Prompt processing reaches 1224.07 t/s at 512 tokens and generation 63.00 t/s at 128 tokens. Without KV quantization, generation is 79.92 t/s but prompt processing drops to 1167.28 t/s at 512 tokens. The fork is optimized for D=128 head dimension models and reports 5-11% prompt processing improvement from flash attention.

Oct 3, 2026
AMD hardware
generation:
66.1 tokens/s
quant:
Q4_K_M (GGUF)
coding

User benchmarks Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B at 66.11 t/s generation on one AMD Radeon Instinct Mi50 32GB. Setup is llama.cpp build 128d522c (6686) with the ROCm backend, Q4_K_M quant (17.28 GiB), -ngl 99, 112 threads and --numa distribute on a dual Xeon 8480+ host. Other quants on the same card: Q5_0 65.15 t/s, Q6_K 62.49 t/s, Q8_0 64.20 t/s. BF16 (56.89 GiB) required two GPUs and ran 41.41 t/s. With 16K tokens of output the rate falls to about 20 t/s.

Sep 30, 2026
Tone: positiveAMD hardware
prompt processing (prefill):
95.0 tokens/s
quant:
Q4_K_M (GGUF)
kv:
q8_0

User reports Gemma 4 26B at 65-68 tok/s on an AMD Instinct MI50 32GB. Setup is Ollama v0.32.14 with Q4_K_M and q8_0 KV cache, flash attention on, all layers offloaded, MTP speculative decoding enabled automatically. The figure is a range; short answers reach ~95 tok/s prompt eval. A QAT Q4_0 build with MTP reaches ~78 tok/s, and Qwen 3.5 35B Q6_K runs at ~52 tok/s with ~541 tok/s prompt eval. Power overdrive to 160W adds another +8-9%.

Sep 29, 2026
AMD hardware
generation:
108.9 tokens/s
quant:
Q4_K (GGUF)
kv:
FP16

User reports Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B decoding at 108.9 tok/s on an AMD MI50 32GB, 1.9x the llama.cpp baseline of 57.2 tok/s on the same GGUF and GPU. Setup is a custom HIP engine with Q4_K weights and FP16 KV cache, short context of 273-529 tokens, model load 27.6 s, sclk 1725 MHz under load. The engine reproduces llama.cpp's 8-token greedy continuation 8/8 teacher-forced and free-running; the MTP layer is not loaded.

Sep 26, 2026

Qwen3.8 27B

AMD MI50 32GB · MI50-llama.cpp · 66,560 ctx

AMD hardware
generation:
22.8 tokens/s
quant:
Q8_0 (GGUF)
kv:
Q8_0
codinglong-context

User reports Qwen3.8-27B at 22.8 tok/s decode on a single AMD Instinct MI50 32GB, using the MI50-llama.cpp fork. Setup is llama.cpp with Q8_0 weights and Q8_0 KV cache, flash attention on, one slot, 66560 context. Decode holds 22.0 tok/s at 16k and 20.4 tok/s at 64k; MTP with 3 drafts reaches 28.8 tok/s on a 64k reasoning prompt, 51.8 tok/s on short code, 43.2 tok/s on prose, and 24.2 tok/s on a 106.7k prompt. Max context is 114,688 with -ub 512. All figures are single-stream.

Sep 25, 2026

Qwen3.8 125B (6B active) Flash-Next

3× AMD MI50 32GB · llama.cpp · 130,000 ctx

AMD hardware
generation:
15.0 tokens/s
quant:
UD-Q4_K_XL (GGUF)

User reports 15 t/s generation and 100-200 t/s prompt processing at 130k context. Setup is ROCm with flash-attn, split-mode layer and fit on. The user notes Vulkan gives similar speed.

Sep 9, 2026

Unknown family

AMD MI50 32GB · llama.cpp

Tone: positiveAMD hardware
generation:
15.1 tokens/s
prompt processing (prefill):
410.0 tokens/s

User benchmarks the gfx906-llama-cpp fork on an MI50 32GB, reaching 410 t/s prefill at PP16384 against 332.5 t/s upstream, 264 t/s on a 120k deep fill against 231.4 t/s upstream, and 15.1 t/s TG against 13.6 t/s upstream. Outputs are bit-identical to upstream. The user attributes the gains to exploring existing llama.cpp PRs.

Sep 9, 2026
Tone: positiveAMD hardware
generation:
15-16 tokens/s
prompt processing (prefill):
105-110 tokens/s
quant:
UD-IQ2_M
coding

User reports DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 at 15-16 t/s generation and 105-110 t/s prompt processing on 3x AMD MI50 32GB GPUs, 96GB of VRAM in total. Setup is llama-server (llama.cpp) with the UD-IQ2_M quant. The 90.9GB model fits fully in VRAM. The user tested it with a Rubik's cube HTML coding task and is impressed it runs locally.

Sep 7, 2026

Qwen3.8 27B

AMD MI50 32GB · llama.cpp · 120,000 ctx

AMD hardware
generation:
13.6 tokens/s
prompt processing (prefill):
379.2 tokens/s

User reports a fork optimized for AMD gfx906 (MI50/MI60/Radeon VII) reaching 379.2 t/s prefill versus 332.3 t/s (+14.1%), 252.6 t/s versus 231.1 t/s on a 120k-context fill (+9.3%), and 13.6 t/s versus 13.5 t/s deep-context TG. DFlash acceptance is 0.691.

Sep 7, 2026

Qwen3.6 27B

2× AMD MI50 32GB · llama.cpp

AMD hardware
quant:
Q8_0 (GGUF)
kv:
Q8
mtp (multi-token prediction):
on

User benchmarks MTP KV cache quantization at Q8_0 against no quantization on Qwen3.6-27B-Q8_0 with llama.cpp. Setup uses tensor parallelism on 2xMI50 32GB. Wall time difference is negligible at roughly 0.14s with the quantized draft KV cache. Aggregate accept rate is 0.735-0.741.

May 19, 2026
AMD hardware
generation:
9.7 tokens/s
prompt processing (prefill):
264.0 tokens/s

User reports Kimi K2.6 at 264 t/s prompt processing and 9.7 t/s generation on 32x AMD MI50 32GB GPUs.

May 1, 2026
Showing 1–14 of 14
Page 1 of 1

Community benchmarks snapshot

Records by GPU

AMD Strix Halo 128GB318NVIDIA RTX 3090219NVIDIA RTX 5090169NVIDIA DGX Spark91NVIDIA RTX 5060 Ti 16GB72NVIDIA RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell70M5 Max 48GB67NVIDIA RTX 3060 12GB65AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 32GB63NVIDIA RTX 409057

Records by model

2687 total
Qwen3.81268
Qwen3.6282
Gemma 4168
DeepSeek V4 Flash149
Qwen3.5121
Qwen375
other624

Records by engine

1974 total
llama.cpp1007
vLLM205
Strata148
MLX106
Ollama83
other425

Use cases

coding 731agentic 465long-context 340tool-use 207vision 134summarization 61math 57creative-writing 46multilingual 29rp 13text-generation 9reasoning 3
coding731agentic465long-context340tool-use207vision134summarization61math57creative-writing46

Median generation t/s by GPU

On Qwen3.8 27B at 4-bit, plain single-GPU runs. Full ranking

RTX 509080RTX Pro 600067M5 Ultra 256GB50RX 7900 XTX43RTX 409040RTX 309038RX 7800 XT 16GB35RTX 5090 Laptop 24GB34M3 Ultra 512GB32V100 32GB31

Prompt processing, same model

M5 Ultra 256GB1800RX 7900 XTX640RTX 40901949RTX 3090561M3 Ultra 512GB391V100 32GB941Radeon AI PRO R9700 32GB1287RTX 3080 20GB997Arc Pro B70512M1 Ultra 128GB153

Reports by model size

Qwen3.8 27B709Qwen3.8 125B · 6B active496Qwen3.6 35B · 3B active192DeepSeek V4 Flash 284B · 13B active132Qwen3.6 27B79Gemma 4 26B · 4B active59DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 552B · 16B active48GLM-5.3 320B · 18B active45

Quants

Q4_K_M341UD-Q4_K_XL156NVFP4148Q8_01074-bit91IQ4_XS76Q4_K_XL74MXFP466IQ3_XXS65IQ3_S58