AMD MI50 16GB vs AMD RX 6700 XT for local LLMs
5 reports on the AMD MI50 16GB and 3 on the AMD RX 6700 XT
Which is faster for local LLMs?
Nobody has reported the same model at the same quant on both cards yet, so there's no measured head-to-head. Memory bandwidth, which caps how fast a card can write, is 2.7x higher on the AMD MI50 16GB (1,024 GB/s on the AMD MI50 16GB, 384 on the AMD RX 6700 XT). The estimates below compare them on the models people run most.
AMD MI50 16GB
- Memory
- 16GB
- Memory bandwidth
- 1,024 GB/s
- FP16 compute
- 26.5 TFLOPS
- Reports
- 5
AMD RX 6700 XT
- Memory
- 12GB
- Memory bandwidth
- 384 GB/s
- FP16 compute
- 26.4 TFLOPS
- Reports
- 3
Estimated by the calculator
The quant the calculator recommends for each card and its estimated speed at a 32,768-token context with 32 GB of system RAM, from memory bandwidth and the model's shape.
| Model | AMD MI50 16GB | AMD RX 6700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.8 27B | 66.7 t/sQ2_K | 1.6 t/sQ8_0, layers on CPU |
| Qwen3.8 125B · 6B active | doesn't fit at these settings | doesn't fit at these settings |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash 284B · 13B active | doesn't fit at these settings | doesn't fit at these settings |
| Qwen3.6 35B · 3B active | 220.8 t/sQ2_K | 13.3 t/sQ6_K, experts in RAM |
| Qwen3.6 27B | 66.7 t/sQ2_K | 1.6 t/sQ8_0, layers on CPU |
| Gemma 4 26B · 4B active | 148.9 t/sQ3_K_S | 62.7 t/sQ2_K |
Change the context, RAM or model in the calculator: AMD MI50 16GB · AMD RX 6700 XT
Every report on each card, with its source: AMD MI50 16GB · AMD RX 6700 XT