llamaperf

Intel Arc Pro B70 vs M4 Max 128GB for local LLMs

19 reports on the Intel Arc Pro B70 and 52 on the M4 Max 128GB

Which is faster for local LLMs?

On Qwen3.6 35B · 3B active at 4-bit, the Intel Arc Pro B70 has 63.7 generation tokens/s (5 runs); prompt processing 977.4 tokens/s (4 runs); the M4 Max 128GB has 81.1 generation tokens/s (one run); prompt processing 1423.5 tokens/s (one run). Those are community reports whose engines and settings differ, so the gap is a rough sign, not a controlled measure of the two cards. Memory bandwidth, which caps how fast a card can write, is 11% higher on the Intel Arc Pro B70 (608 GB/s on the Intel Arc Pro B70, 546 on the M4 Max 128GB). Across 3 shared models with generation measurements on both cards, the Intel Arc Pro B70's median is higher on 2 and the M4 Max 128GB's on 1.

Intel Arc Pro B70
Memory
32GB
Memory bandwidth
608 GB/s
FP16 compute
183.5 TFLOPS
Reports
19
M4 Max 128GB
Memory
128GB unified
Memory bandwidth
546 GB/s
FP16 compute
18.4 TFLOPS
Reports
52

Measured on both

Generation and prompt processing speeds from plain runs (one device, one request, no speculative decoding, the whole model in the device's memory) of the same model size at the same bit class. Each side shows the engines and reported context behind its median. Context can mean a configured window or prompt depth, so these are community comparisons with differing settings. How to read these

ModelIntel Arc Pro B70M4 Max 128GB
Qwen3.6 35B · 3B active4-bit63.75 runsPP 977.4 (4 runs)llama.cpp127K to 256K context, 2 not stated81.1one runPP 1423.5 (one run)llama.cppcontext not stated
Qwen3.8 27B4-bit25.6one runPP 512.1 (one run)llama.cppcontext not stated21.8one runPP 236.6 (one run)llama.cppcontext not stated
Qwen3.8 27B8-bit16.7one runPP 1047.0 (one run)llama.cppcontext not stated15.7one runPP 255.7 (one run)llama.cppcontext not stated

Estimated by the calculator

The quant the calculator recommends for each card and its estimated speed at a 32,768-token context with 32 GB of system RAM, from memory bandwidth and the model's shape. Where a model was also measured above, the measurement wins.

ModelIntel Arc Pro B70M4 Max 128GB
Qwen3.6 35B · 3B active55.3 t/sQ5_K_M21.2 t/sFP16
Qwen3.8 27B15.2 t/sQ6_K6.7 t/sFP16
Qwen3.8 125B · 6B active18.6 t/sQ2_K, experts in RAM30.7 t/sQ5_K_S
DeepSeek V4 Flash 284B · 13B activedoesn't fit at these settings48.3 t/sQ2_K
Qwen3.6 27B15.2 t/sQ6_K6.7 t/sFP16
Gemma 4 26B · 4B active38.8 t/sQ6_K18.2 t/sFP16
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 552B · 16B activedoesn't fit at these settingsdoesn't fit at these settings
GLM-5.3 320B · 18B activedoesn't fit at these settingsdoesn't fit at these settings

Change the context, RAM or model in the calculator: Intel Arc Pro B70 · M4 Max 128GB

Every report on each card, with its source: Intel Arc Pro B70 · M4 Max 128GB

More comparisons