llamaperf

M2 Ultra 192GB vs M4 Max 128GB for local LLMs

9 reports on the M2 Ultra 192GB and 52 on the M4 Max 128GB

Which is faster for local LLMs?

On Qwen3.8 27B at 6-bit, the M2 Ultra 192GB has 22.4 generation tokens/s (one run); prompt processing 360.2 tokens/s (one run); the M4 Max 128GB has 17.2 generation tokens/s (one run); prompt processing 246.3 tokens/s (one run). Those are community reports whose engines and settings differ, so the gap is a rough sign, not a controlled measure of the two cards. Memory bandwidth, which caps how fast a card can write, is 1.5x higher on the M2 Ultra 192GB (819 GB/s on the M2 Ultra 192GB, 546 on the M4 Max 128GB).

M2 Ultra 192GB
Memory
192GB unified
Memory bandwidth
819 GB/s
FP16 compute
27.2 TFLOPS
Reports
9
M4 Max 128GB
Memory
128GB unified
Memory bandwidth
546 GB/s
FP16 compute
18.4 TFLOPS
Reports
52

Measured on both

Generation and prompt processing speeds from plain runs (one device, one request, no speculative decoding, the whole model in the device's memory) of the same model size at the same bit class. Each side shows the engines and reported context behind its median. Context can mean a configured window or prompt depth, so these are community comparisons with differing settings. How to read these

ModelM2 Ultra 192GBM4 Max 128GB
Qwen3.8 27B6-bit22.4one runPP 360.2 (one run)llama.cpp128K context17.2one runPP 246.3 (one run)llama.cppcontext not stated

Estimated by the calculator

The quant the calculator recommends for each card and its estimated speed at a 32,768-token context with 32 GB of system RAM, from memory bandwidth and the model's shape. Where a model was also measured above, the measurement wins.

ModelM2 Ultra 192GBM4 Max 128GB
Qwen3.8 27B8.3 t/sFP166.7 t/sFP16
Qwen3.8 125B · 6B active33.0 t/sQ6_K30.7 t/sQ5_K_S
Qwen3.6 35B · 3B active29.9 t/sFP1621.2 t/sFP16
DeepSeek V4 Flash 284B · 13B active62.8 t/sQ3_K_S48.3 t/sQ2_K
Qwen3.6 27B8.3 t/sFP166.7 t/sFP16
Gemma 4 26B · 4B active22.5 t/sFP1618.2 t/sFP16
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 552B · 16B activedoesn't fit at these settingsdoesn't fit at these settings

Change the context, RAM or model in the calculator: M2 Ultra 192GB · M4 Max 128GB

Every report on each card, with its source: M2 Ultra 192GB · M4 Max 128GB

More comparisons