llamaperf

M3 Ultra 256GB vs M3 Ultra 512GB for local LLMs

15 reports on the M3 Ultra 256GB and 41 on the M3 Ultra 512GB

Which is faster for local LLMs?

On Qwen3.8 125B · 6B active at 4-bit, the M3 Ultra 256GB has 25.7 generation tokens/s (one run); the M3 Ultra 512GB has 28.0 generation tokens/s (2 runs); prompt processing 558.8 tokens/s (one run). Those are community reports whose engines and settings differ, so the gap is a rough sign, not a controlled measure of the two cards. Memory bandwidth, which caps how fast a card can write, is about the same on both (819 GB/s on the M3 Ultra 256GB, 819 on the M3 Ultra 512GB). Across 3 shared models with generation measurements on both cards, the M3 Ultra 256GB's median is higher on 1 and the M3 Ultra 512GB's on 2.

M3 Ultra 256GB
Memory
256GB unified
Memory bandwidth
819 GB/s
FP16 compute
28.4 TFLOPS
Reports
15
M3 Ultra 512GB
Memory
512GB unified
Memory bandwidth
819 GB/s
FP16 compute
28.4 TFLOPS
Reports
41

Measured on both

Generation and prompt processing speeds from plain runs (one device, one request, no speculative decoding, the whole model in the device's memory) of the same model size at the same bit class. Each side shows the engines and reported context behind its median. Context can mean a configured window or prompt depth, so these are community comparisons with differing settings. How to read these

ModelM3 Ultra 256GBM3 Ultra 512GB
Qwen3.8 125B · 6B active4-bit25.7one runengine not statedcontext not stated28.02 runsPP 558.8 (one run)llama.cpp, oMLX250K context, 1 not stated
DeepSeek V4 Flash 284B · 13B active8-bit22.0one runPP 75.0 (one run)engine not stated1024K context20.0one runPP 533.0 (one run)oMLXcontext not stated
Qwen3.8 27B4-bit14.0one runPP 93.1 (one run)Ollamacontext not stated31.8one runPP 391.2 (one run)MLXcontext not stated

Estimated by the calculator

The quant the calculator recommends for each card and its estimated speed at a 32,768-token context with 32 GB of system RAM, from memory bandwidth and the model's shape. Where a model was also measured above, the measurement wins.

ModelM3 Ultra 256GBM3 Ultra 512GB
Qwen3.8 125B · 6B active27.3 t/sQ8_013.6 t/sFP16
DeepSeek V4 Flash 284B · 13B active36.0 t/sQ4_K_M22.6 t/sQ8_0
Qwen3.8 27B8.0 t/sFP168.0 t/sFP16
Qwen3.6 35B · 3B active28.7 t/sFP1628.7 t/sFP16
Qwen3.6 27B8.0 t/sFP168.0 t/sFP16
Gemma 4 26B · 4B active21.5 t/sFP1621.5 t/sFP16
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 552B · 16B active48.0 t/sQ2_K30.0 t/sQ4_K_M
GLM-5.3 320B · 18B active19.1 t/sQ3_K_M7.4 t/sQ8_0
Qwen3.5 9B23.9 t/sFP1623.9 t/sFP16

Change the context, RAM or model in the calculator: M3 Ultra 256GB · M3 Ultra 512GB

Every report on each card, with its source: M3 Ultra 256GB · M3 Ultra 512GB

More comparisons