llamaperf

M3 Ultra 256GB vs M4 Max 128GB for local LLMs

15 reports on the M3 Ultra 256GB and 53 on the M4 Max 128GB

Which is faster for local LLMs?

On Qwen3.8 125B · 6B active at 4-bit, the M3 Ultra 256GB has 25.7 generation tokens/s (one run); the M4 Max 128GB has 57.2 generation tokens/s (2 runs); prompt processing 586.0 tokens/s (one run). Those are community reports whose engines and settings differ, so the gap is a rough sign, not a controlled measure of the two cards. Memory bandwidth, which caps how fast a card can write, is 1.5x higher on the M3 Ultra 256GB (819 GB/s on the M3 Ultra 256GB, 546 on the M4 Max 128GB). Across 3 shared models with generation measurements on both cards, the M3 Ultra 256GB's median is higher on 1 and the M4 Max 128GB's on 2.

M3 Ultra 256GB
Memory
256GB unified
Memory bandwidth
819 GB/s
FP16 compute
28.4 TFLOPS
Reports
15
M4 Max 128GB
Memory
128GB unified
Memory bandwidth
546 GB/s
FP16 compute
18.4 TFLOPS
Reports
53

Measured on both

Generation and prompt processing speeds from plain runs (one device, one request, no speculative decoding, the whole model in the device's memory) of the same model size at the same bit class. Each side shows the engines and reported context behind its median. Context can mean a configured window or prompt depth, so these are community comparisons with differing settings. How to read these

ModelM3 Ultra 256GBM4 Max 128GB
Qwen3.8 125B · 6B active4-bit25.7one runengine not statedcontext not stated57.22 runsPP 586.0 (one run)oMLX, 1 not statedcontext not stated
Qwen3.5 9B4-bit107.5one runengine not statedcontext not stated68.0one runPP 832.1 (one run)llama.cppcontext not stated
Qwen3.8 27B4-bit14.0one runPP 93.1 (one run)Ollamacontext not stated21.8one runPP 236.6 (one run)llama.cppcontext not stated

Estimated by the calculator

The quant the calculator recommends for each card and its estimated speed at a 32,768-token context with 32 GB of system RAM, from memory bandwidth and the model's shape. Where a model was also measured above, the measurement wins.

ModelM3 Ultra 256GBM4 Max 128GB
Qwen3.8 125B · 6B active27.3 t/sQ8_030.7 t/sQ5_K_S
Qwen3.5 9B23.9 t/sFP1620.2 t/sFP16
Qwen3.8 27B8.0 t/sFP166.7 t/sFP16
Qwen3.6 35B · 3B active28.7 t/sFP1621.2 t/sFP16
DeepSeek V4 Flash 284B · 13B active36.0 t/sQ4_K_M48.3 t/sQ2_K
Qwen3.6 27B8.0 t/sFP166.7 t/sFP16
Gemma 4 26B · 4B active21.5 t/sFP1618.2 t/sFP16
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 552B · 16B active48.0 t/sQ2_Kdoesn't fit at these settings
GLM-5.3 320B · 18B active19.1 t/sQ3_K_Mdoesn't fit at these settings

Change the context, RAM or model in the calculator: M3 Ultra 256GB · M4 Max 128GB

Every report on each card, with its source: M3 Ultra 256GB · M4 Max 128GB

More comparisons