llamaperf

M3 Ultra 512GB vs M5 Max 128GB for local LLMs

41 reports on the M3 Ultra 512GB and 48 on the M5 Max 128GB

Which is faster for local LLMs?

On Qwen3.8 125B · 6B active at 4-bit, the M3 Ultra 512GB has 28.0 generation tokens/s (2 runs); prompt processing 558.8 tokens/s (one run); the M5 Max 128GB has 55.0 generation tokens/s (one run). Those are community reports whose engines and settings differ, so the gap is a rough sign, not a controlled measure of the two cards. Memory bandwidth, which caps how fast a card can write, is 33% higher on the M3 Ultra 512GB (819 GB/s on the M3 Ultra 512GB, 614 on the M5 Max 128GB). Across 3 shared models with generation measurements on both cards, the M3 Ultra 512GB's median is higher on 1 and the M5 Max 128GB's on 2.

M3 Ultra 512GB
Memory
512GB unified
Memory bandwidth
819 GB/s
FP16 compute
28.4 TFLOPS
Reports
41
M5 Max 128GB
Memory
128GB unified
Memory bandwidth
614 GB/s
FP16 compute
not on record
Reports
48

Measured on both

Generation and prompt processing speeds from plain runs (one device, one request, no speculative decoding, the whole model in the device's memory) of the same model size at the same bit class. Each side shows the engines and reported context behind its median. Context can mean a configured window or prompt depth, so these are community comparisons with differing settings. How to read these

ModelM3 Ultra 512GBM5 Max 128GB
Qwen3.8 125B · 6B active4-bit28.02 runsPP 558.8 (one run)llama.cpp, oMLX250K context, 1 not stated55.0one runengine not statedcontext not stated
DeepSeek V4 Flash 284B · 13B active4-bit29.9one runPP 426.5 (one run)MLXcontext not stated36.1one runPP 498.3 (one run)oMLX1K context
Qwen3.6 35B · 3B active8-bit81.2one runPP 2324.6 (one run)engine not statedcontext not stated79.4one runPP 2153.0 (one run)llama.cpp125K context

Estimated by the calculator

The quant the calculator recommends for each card and its estimated speed at a 32,768-token context with 32 GB of system RAM, from memory bandwidth and the model's shape. Where a model was also measured above, the measurement wins.

ModelM3 Ultra 512GBM5 Max 128GB
Qwen3.8 125B · 6B active13.6 t/sFP1641.2 t/sQ5_K_S
DeepSeek V4 Flash 284B · 13B active22.6 t/sQ8_064.8 t/sQ2_K
Qwen3.6 35B · 3B active28.7 t/sFP1628.5 t/sFP16
Qwen3.8 27B8.0 t/sFP169.0 t/sFP16
Qwen3.6 27B8.0 t/sFP169.0 t/sFP16
Gemma 4 26B · 4B active21.5 t/sFP1624.4 t/sFP16
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 552B · 16B active30.0 t/sQ4_K_Mdoesn't fit at these settings
GLM-5.3 320B · 18B active7.4 t/sQ8_0doesn't fit at these settings
Qwen3.5 9B23.9 t/sFP1627.1 t/sFP16

Change the context, RAM or model in the calculator: M3 Ultra 512GB · M5 Max 128GB

Every report on each card, with its source: M3 Ultra 512GB · M5 Max 128GB

More comparisons