llamaperf

M3 Ultra 96GB vs AMD Strix Halo 128GB for local LLMs

10 reports on the M3 Ultra 96GB and 318 on the AMD Strix Halo 128GB

Which is faster for local LLMs?

On gpt-oss 117B · 5.1B active at 4-bit, the M3 Ultra 96GB has 73.0 generation tokens/s (one run); prompt processing 347.0 tokens/s (one run); the AMD Strix Halo 128GB has 52.6 generation tokens/s (4 runs); prompt processing 572.5 tokens/s (4 runs). Those are community reports whose engines and settings differ, so the gap is a rough sign, not a controlled measure of the two cards. Memory bandwidth, which caps how fast a card can write, is 3.2x higher on the M3 Ultra 96GB (819 GB/s on the M3 Ultra 96GB, 256 on the AMD Strix Halo 128GB). Across 3 shared models with generation measurements on both cards, the M3 Ultra 96GB's median is higher on 3 and the AMD Strix Halo 128GB's on 0.

M3 Ultra 96GB
Memory
96GB unified
Memory bandwidth
819 GB/s
FP16 compute
21.3 TFLOPS
Reports
10
AMD Strix Halo 128GB
Memory
128GB unified
Memory bandwidth
256 GB/s
FP16 compute
59 TFLOPS
Reports
318

Measured on both

Generation and prompt processing speeds from plain runs (one device, one request, no speculative decoding, the whole model in the device's memory) of the same model size at the same bit class. Each side shows the engines and reported context behind its median. Context can mean a configured window or prompt depth, so these are community comparisons with differing settings. How to read these

ModelM3 Ultra 96GBAMD Strix Halo 128GB
gpt-oss 117B · 5.1B active4-bit73.0one runPP 347.0 (one run)MLXcontext not stated52.64 runsPP 572.5 (4 runs)llama.cpp, 2 not statedcontext not stated
Qwen3.5 35B · 3B active4-bit109.7one runPP 1770.1 (one run)MLXcontext not stated52.42 runsPP 1017.0 (one run)llama.cpp, 1 not stated128K context, 1 not stated
Qwen3.5 35B · 3B active8-bit73.4one runPP 1808.0 (one run)llama.cppcontext not stated49.7one runllama.cppcontext not stated

Estimated by the calculator

The quant the calculator recommends for each card and its estimated speed at a 32,768-token context with 32 GB of system RAM, from memory bandwidth and the model's shape. Where a model was also measured above, the measurement wins.

ModelM3 Ultra 96GBAMD Strix Halo 128GB
gpt-oss 117B · 5.1B active68.5 t/sQ3_K_M15.8 t/sQ6_K
Qwen3.5 35B · 3B active57.1 t/sQ8_012.6 t/sFP16
Qwen3.8 27B7.9 t/sFP163.5 t/sFP16
Qwen3.8 125B · 6B active55.1 t/sQ3_K_M12.6 t/sQ6_K
Qwen3.6 35B · 3B active57.1 t/sQ8_012.6 t/sFP16
DeepSeek V4 Flash 284B · 13B activedoesn't fit at these settings33.5 t/sQ2_K
Qwen3.6 27B7.9 t/sFP163.5 t/sFP16
Gemma 4 26B · 4B active19.0 t/sFP169.5 t/sFP16

Change the context, RAM or model in the calculator: M3 Ultra 96GB · AMD Strix Halo 128GB

Every report on each card, with its source: M3 Ultra 96GB · AMD Strix Halo 128GB

More comparisons