llamaperf

M5 Max 128GB vs AMD Radeon 780M for local LLMs

26 reports on the M5 Max 128GB and 5 on the AMD Radeon 780M

Which is faster for local LLMs?

On Qwen3.6 35B · 3B active at 8-bit, the M5 Max 128GB runs at 79.4 tokens per second (one run) and the AMD Radeon 780M at 19.7 (2 runs). Those are community reports whose engines and settings differ, so the gap is a rough sign, not a controlled measure of the two cards. Memory bandwidth, which caps how fast a card can write, is 5.1x higher on the M5 Max 128GB (614 GB/s on the M5 Max 128GB, 120 on the AMD Radeon 780M).

M5 Max 128GB
Memory
128GB unified
Memory bandwidth
614 GB/s
FP16 compute
not on record
Reports
26
AMD Radeon 780M
Memory
shared memory unified
Memory bandwidth
not on record
FP16 compute
not on record
Reports
5

Measured on both

Median tokens per second from plain runs (one device, one request, no speculative decoding, the whole model in the device's memory) of the same model size at the same quant level. Engines and context lengths can still differ between the runs. How to read these

ModelM5 Max 128GBAMD Radeon 780M
Qwen3.6 35B · 3B active8-bit79.4one run19.72 runs

Estimated by the calculator

The quant the calculator recommends for each card and its estimated speed at a 32,768-token context with 32 GB of system RAM, from memory bandwidth and the model's shape. Where a model was also measured above, the measurement wins.

ModelM5 Max 128GBAMD Radeon 780M
Qwen3.6 35B · 3B active28.5 t/sFP16not in the calculator yet
Qwen3.8 27B9.0 t/sFP16not in the calculator yet
Qwen3.8 125B · 6B active41.2 t/sQ5_K_Snot in the calculator yet
DeepSeek V4 Flash 284B · 13B active64.8 t/sQ2_Knot in the calculator yet
Qwen3.6 27B9.0 t/sFP16not in the calculator yet
Gemma 4 26B · 4B active24.4 t/sFP16not in the calculator yet
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 552B · 16B activedoesn't fit at these settingsnot in the calculator yet

Change the context, RAM or model in the calculator: M5 Max 128GB · AMD Radeon 780M

Every report on each card, with its source: M5 Max 128GB · AMD Radeon 780M

More comparisons