llamaperf

M5 Max 48GB vs NVIDIA RTX 5090 for local LLMs

67 reports on the M5 Max 48GB and 170 on the NVIDIA RTX 5090

Which is faster for local LLMs?

On Qwen3.6 35B · 3B active at 4-bit, the M5 Max 48GB has 137.7 generation tokens/s (2 runs); prompt processing 3338.1 tokens/s (2 runs); the NVIDIA RTX 5090 has 215.1 generation tokens/s (one run). Those are community reports whose engines and settings differ, so the gap is a rough sign, not a controlled measure of the two cards. Memory bandwidth, which caps how fast a card can write, is 2.9x higher on the NVIDIA RTX 5090 (614 GB/s on the M5 Max 48GB, 1,792 on the NVIDIA RTX 5090). Across 6 shared models with generation measurements on both cards, the M5 Max 48GB's median is higher on 0 and the NVIDIA RTX 5090's on 6.

M5 Max 48GB
Memory
48GB unified
Memory bandwidth
614 GB/s
FP16 compute
not on record
Reports
67
NVIDIA RTX 5090
Memory
32GB
Memory bandwidth
1,792 GB/s
FP16 compute
419 TFLOPS
Reports
170

Measured on both

Generation and prompt processing speeds from plain runs (one device, one request, no speculative decoding, the whole model in the device's memory) of the same model size at the same bit class. Each side shows the engines and reported context behind its median. Context can mean a configured window or prompt depth, so these are community comparisons with differing settings. How to read these

ModelM5 Max 48GBNVIDIA RTX 5090
Qwen3.6 35B · 3B active4-bit137.72 runsPP 3338.1 (2 runs)llama.cpp, MLXcontext not stated215.1one runllama.cppcontext not stated
Gemma 4 31B4-bit25.2one runPP 626.5 (one run)llama.cppcontext not stated64.0one runOllama32K context
Gemma 4 26B · 4B active4-bit116.9one runPP 3423.2 (one run)llama.cppcontext not stated243.9one runPP 13809.2 (one run)llama.cppcontext not stated
Qwen3 30B · 3B active4-bit148.5one runPP 3496.9 (one run)llama.cppcontext not stated352.1one runllama.cppcontext not stated
Qwen3.5 35B · 3B active4-bit111.2one runPP 3378.3 (one run)llama.cppcontext not stated194.0one runllama.cppcontext not stated
Qwen3.5 27B4-bit29.2one runPP 730.5 (one run)llama.cppcontext not stated30.1one runPP 1515.8 (one run)llama.cpp1K context

Estimated by the calculator

The quant the calculator recommends for each card and its estimated speed at a 32,768-token context with 32 GB of system RAM, from memory bandwidth and the model's shape. Where a model was also measured above, the measurement wins.

ModelM5 Max 48GBNVIDIA RTX 5090
Qwen3.6 35B · 3B active88.4 t/sQ5_K_M163.0 t/sQ5_K_M
Gemma 4 31B19.4 t/sQ6_K46.2 t/sQ5_K_M
Gemma 4 26B · 4B active43.2 t/sQ8_0114.5 t/sQ6_K
Qwen3 30B · 3B active104.1 t/sQ5_K_S262.8 t/sQ4_K_S
Qwen3.5 35B · 3B active88.4 t/sQ5_K_M163.0 t/sQ5_K_M
Qwen3.5 27B22.3 t/sQ6_K44.9 t/sQ6_K
Qwen3.8 27B22.3 t/sQ6_K44.9 t/sQ6_K
Qwen3.8 125B · 6B activedoesn't fit at these settings20.3 t/sQ2_K, experts in RAM
DeepSeek V4 Flash 284B · 13B activedoesn't fit at these settingsdoesn't fit at these settings
Qwen3.6 27B22.3 t/sQ6_K44.9 t/sQ6_K
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 552B · 16B activedoesn't fit at these settingsdoesn't fit at these settings
GLM-5.3 320B · 18B activedoesn't fit at these settingsdoesn't fit at these settings

Change the context, RAM or model in the calculator: M5 Max 48GB · NVIDIA RTX 5090

Every report on each card, with its source: M5 Max 48GB · NVIDIA RTX 5090

More comparisons