llamaperf

M5 Pro 24GB vs M6 16GB for local LLMs

3 reports on the M5 Pro 24GB and 0 on the M6 16GB

Which is faster for local LLMs?

Nobody has reported the same model at the same quant on both cards yet, so there's no measured head-to-head. Memory bandwidth, which caps how fast a card can write, is 2.0x higher on the M5 Pro 24GB (307 GB/s on the M5 Pro 24GB, 154 on the M6 16GB). The estimates below compare them on the models people run most.

M5 Pro 24GB
Memory
24GB unified
Memory bandwidth
307 GB/s
FP16 compute
not on record
Reports
3
M6 16GB
Memory
16GB unified
Memory bandwidth
154 GB/s
FP16 compute
not on record
Reports
0

Estimated by the calculator

The quant the calculator recommends for each card and its estimated speed at a 32,768-token context with 32 GB of system RAM, from memory bandwidth and the model's shape.

ModelM5 Pro 24GBM6 16GB
Qwen3.8 27B31.1 t/sQ2_Kdoesn't fit at these settings
Qwen3.8 125B · 6B activedoesn't fit at these settingsdoesn't fit at these settings
DeepSeek V4 Flash 284B · 13B activedoesn't fit at these settingsdoesn't fit at these settings
Qwen3.6 35B · 3B active102.9 t/sQ2_Kdoesn't fit at these settings
Qwen3.6 27B31.1 t/sQ2_Kdoesn't fit at these settings
Gemma 4 26B · 4B active69.3 t/sQ3_K_Sdoesn't fit at these settings

Change the context, RAM or model in the calculator: M5 Pro 24GB · M6 16GB

Every report on each card, with its source: M5 Pro 24GB · M6 16GB

More comparisons