llamaperf

M5 Ultra 96GB vs NVIDIA RTX 3090 for local LLMs

3 reports on the M5 Ultra 96GB and 165 on the NVIDIA RTX 3090

Which is faster for local LLMs?

Nobody has reported the same model at the same quant on both cards yet, so there's no measured head-to-head. Memory bandwidth, which caps how fast a card can write, is 31% higher on the M5 Ultra 96GB (1,229 GB/s on the M5 Ultra 96GB, 936 on the NVIDIA RTX 3090). The estimates below compare them on the models people run most.

M5 Ultra 96GB
Memory
96GB unified
Memory bandwidth
1,229 GB/s
FP16 compute
not on record
Reports
3
NVIDIA RTX 3090
Memory
24GB
Memory bandwidth
936 GB/s
FP16 compute
142 TFLOPS
Reports
165

Estimated by the calculator

The quant the calculator recommends for each card and its estimated speed at a 32,768-token context with 32 GB of system RAM, from memory bandwidth and the model's shape.

ModelM5 Ultra 96GBNVIDIA RTX 3090
Qwen3.8 27B14.9 t/sFP1633.9 t/sQ4_K_M
Qwen3.8 125B · 6B active103.1 t/sQ3_K_M19.4 t/sQ2_K, experts in RAM
DeepSeek V4 Flash 284B · 13B activedoesn't fit at these settingsdoesn't fit at these settings
Qwen3.6 35B · 3B active107.0 t/sQ8_0120.1 t/sQ4_K_S
Qwen3.6 27B14.9 t/sFP1633.9 t/sQ4_K_M
Gemma 4 26B · 4B active35.5 t/sFP1676.4 t/sQ5_K_S

Change the context, RAM or model in the calculator: M5 Ultra 96GB · NVIDIA RTX 3090

Every report on each card, with its source: M5 Ultra 96GB · NVIDIA RTX 3090

More comparisons