AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 32GB vs AMD Strix Halo 128GB for local LLMs
61 reports on the AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 32GB and 313 on the AMD Strix Halo 128GB
Which is faster for local LLMs?
On Qwen3.8 27B at 4-bit, the AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 32GB has 29.8 generation tokens/s (3 runs); prompt processing 1287.0 tokens/s (one run); the AMD Strix Halo 128GB has 13.1 generation tokens/s (4 runs); prompt processing 378.2 tokens/s (3 runs). Those are community reports whose engines and settings differ, so the gap is a rough sign, not a controlled measure of the two cards. Memory bandwidth, which caps how fast a card can write, is 2.5x higher on the AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 32GB (640 GB/s on the AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 32GB, 256 on the AMD Strix Halo 128GB). Across 3 shared models with generation measurements on both cards, the AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 32GB's median is higher on 3 and the AMD Strix Halo 128GB's on 0.
- Memory
- 32GB
- Memory bandwidth
- 640 GB/s
- FP16 compute
- 191 TFLOPS
- Reports
- 61
- Memory
- 128GB unified
- Memory bandwidth
- 256 GB/s
- FP16 compute
- 59 TFLOPS
- Reports
- 313
Measured on both
Generation and prompt processing speeds from plain runs (one device, one request, no speculative decoding, the whole model in the device's memory) of the same model size at the same bit class. Each side shows the engines and reported context behind its median. Context can mean a configured window or prompt depth, so these are community comparisons with differing settings. How to read these
| Model | AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 32GB | AMD Strix Halo 128GB |
|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.8 27B4-bit | 29.83 runsPP 1287.0 (one run)llama.cpp, 1 not stated2K context, 2 not stated | 13.14 runsPP 378.2 (3 runs)llama.cpp, 1 not stated32K context, 3 not stated |
| Qwen3.6 35B · 3B active4-bit | 61.4one runPP 7800.0 (one run)vLLM256K context | 60.07 runsPP 1005.3 (7 runs)llama.cpp, 3 not stated30K context, 6 not stated |
| Qwen3.5 35B · 3B active4-bit | 149.2one runPP 3075.0 (one run)llama.cppcontext not stated | 52.42 runsPP 1017.0 (one run)llama.cpp, 1 not stated128K context, 1 not stated |
| Gemma 4 26B · 4B active8-bit | -0 runsPP 3200.0 (one run)llama.cppcontext not stated | 41.6one runPP 1698.9 (one run)llama.cppcontext not stated |
Estimated by the calculator
The quant the calculator recommends for each card and its estimated speed at a 32,768-token context with 32 GB of system RAM, from memory bandwidth and the model's shape. Where a model was also measured above, the measurement wins.
| Model | AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 32GB | AMD Strix Halo 128GB |
|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.8 27B | 16.0 t/sQ6_K | 3.5 t/sFP16 |
| Qwen3.6 35B · 3B active | 58.2 t/sQ5_K_M | 12.6 t/sFP16 |
| Qwen3.5 35B · 3B active | 58.2 t/sQ5_K_M | 12.6 t/sFP16 |
| Gemma 4 26B · 4B active | 40.9 t/sQ6_K | 9.5 t/sFP16 |
| Qwen3.8 125B · 6B active | 18.7 t/sQ2_K, experts in RAM | 12.6 t/sQ6_K |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash 284B · 13B active | doesn't fit at these settings | 33.5 t/sQ2_K |
| Qwen3.6 27B | 16.0 t/sQ6_K | 3.5 t/sFP16 |
| GLM-5.3 320B · 18B active | doesn't fit at these settings | 11.1 t/sQ2_K |
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 552B · 16B active | doesn't fit at these settings | doesn't fit at these settings |
| Qwen3.5 9B | 19.6 t/sFP16 | 10.5 t/sFP16 |
Change the context, RAM or model in the calculator: AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 32GB · AMD Strix Halo 128GB
Every report on each card, with its source: AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 32GB · AMD Strix Halo 128GB