llamaperf

NVIDIA RTX 3090 vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Max-Q for local LLMs

217 reports on the NVIDIA RTX 3090 and 13 on the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Max-Q

Which is faster for local LLMs?

Nobody has reported the same model at the same quant on both cards yet, so there's no measured head-to-head. Memory bandwidth, which caps how fast a card can write, is 1.9x higher on the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Max-Q (936 GB/s on the NVIDIA RTX 3090, 1,792 on the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Max-Q). The estimates below compare them on the models people run most.

NVIDIA RTX 3090
Memory
24GB
Memory bandwidth
936 GB/s
FP16 compute
142 TFLOPS
Reports
217
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Max-Q
Memory
96GB
Memory bandwidth
1,792 GB/s
FP16 compute
439 TFLOPS
Reports
13

Estimated by the calculator

The quant the calculator recommends for each card and its estimated speed at a 32,768-token context with 32 GB of system RAM, from memory bandwidth and the model's shape.

ModelNVIDIA RTX 3090NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Max-Q
Qwen3.8 27B33.9 t/sQ4_K_M18.3 t/sFP16
Qwen3.8 125B · 6B active19.4 t/sQ2_K, experts in RAM83.1 t/sQ5_K_S
Qwen3.6 35B · 3B active120.1 t/sQ4_K_S57.5 t/sFP16
DeepSeek V4 Flash 284B · 13B activedoesn't fit at these settings130.8 t/sQ2_K
Qwen3.6 27B33.9 t/sQ4_K_M18.3 t/sFP16
Gemma 4 26B · 4B active76.4 t/sQ5_K_S49.3 t/sFP16

Change the context, RAM or model in the calculator: NVIDIA RTX 3090 · NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Max-Q

Every report on each card, with its source: NVIDIA RTX 3090 · NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Max-Q

More comparisons