NVIDIA RTX 5090 vs NVIDIA Rubin 288GB for local LLMs
114 reports on the NVIDIA RTX 5090 and 0 on the NVIDIA Rubin 288GB
Which is faster for local LLMs?
Nobody has reported the same model at the same quant on both cards yet, so there's no measured head-to-head. Memory bandwidth, which caps how fast a card can write, is 12.3x higher on the NVIDIA Rubin 288GB (1,792 GB/s on the NVIDIA RTX 5090, 22,000 on the NVIDIA Rubin 288GB). The estimates below compare them on the models people run most.
NVIDIA RTX 5090
- Memory
- 32GB
- Memory bandwidth
- 1,792 GB/s
- FP16 compute
- 419 TFLOPS
- Reports
- 114
NVIDIA Rubin 288GB
- Memory
- 288GB
- Memory bandwidth
- 22,000 GB/s
- FP16 compute
- 4000 TFLOPS
- Reports
- 0
Estimated by the calculator
The quant the calculator recommends for each card and its estimated speed at a 32,768-token context with 32 GB of system RAM, from memory bandwidth and the model's shape.
| Model | NVIDIA RTX 5090 | NVIDIA Rubin 288GB |
|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.8 27B | 44.9 t/sQ6_K | 224.1 t/sFP16 |
| Qwen3.8 125B · 6B active | 20.3 t/sQ2_K, experts in RAM | 806.7 t/sQ8_0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash 284B · 13B active | doesn't fit at these settings | 726.3 t/sQ6_K |
| Qwen3.6 35B · 3B active | 163.0 t/sQ5_K_M | 806.7 t/sFP16 |
| Qwen3.6 27B | 44.9 t/sQ6_K | 224.1 t/sFP16 |
| Gemma 4 26B · 4B active | 114.5 t/sQ6_K | 605.0 t/sFP16 |
Change the context, RAM or model in the calculator: NVIDIA RTX 5090 · NVIDIA Rubin 288GB
Every report on each card, with its source: NVIDIA RTX 5090 · NVIDIA Rubin 288GB