llamaperf

Gufo on the AMD Strix Halo 128GB

On the AMD Strix Halo 128GB, Gufo runs Qwen3.8 125B · 6B active at 4-bit at a median 26.0 tokens per second for generation, from 3 plain runs (132K to 134K context, 1 not stated).

Speed by model on the AMD Strix Halo 128GB

Plain runs only: one device, one request, no speculative decoding, the whole model in memory. Each row is one model size at one bit class, with the other engines' plain runs of the same model on this card beside it. Context length and build still differ between runs, and each side shows its own.

ModelGufoOther engines
Qwen3.8 125B · 6B active 4-bit26.0 t/smedian of 3, 132K to 134K context, 1 not stated
llama.cpp 23.0 t/smedian of 3, 128K to 160K context, 1 not stated
Gemma 4 26B · 4B active 4-bit67.3 t/smedian of 2, context not statedno other engine reported
Gemma 4 31B 4-bit11.5 t/smedian of 2, context not statedno other engine reported
Gemma 4 31B 8-bit6.4 t/smedian of 2, context not statedno other engine reported
Qwen3.6 35B · 3B active 8-bit50.8 t/sone report, context not stated
llama.cpp 24.1 t/sone report, 512K context, 1 not stated

33 Gufo reports on the AMD Strix Halo 128GB

Newest first. A run on several cards, with speculative decoding, with part of the model in system RAM or with batched requests says so, since each describes a different setup.

Filter these reports on the homepage

Frequently asked

How fast is Gufo on the AMD Strix Halo 128GB?

On the AMD Strix Halo 128GB, Gufo runs Qwen3.8 125B · 6B active at 4-bit at a median 26.0 tokens per second for generation, from 3 plain runs (132K to 134K context, 1 not stated).

Is Gufo faster than other engines on the AMD Strix Halo 128GB?

Same card, same model size and bit class, plain runs only: Qwen3.8 125B · 6B active at 4-bit gives Gufo 26.0 t/s (3 runs) and llama.cpp 23.0 t/s (3). Context length and engine build differ between the runs, so treat it as a lead, not a benchmark.