llamaperf

llama.cpp on the NVIDIA RTX 3090

On the NVIDIA RTX 3090, llama.cpp runs Qwen3.8 27B at 4-bit at a median 35.7 tokens per second for generation, from 2 plain runs (128K context, 1 not stated).

Speed by model on the NVIDIA RTX 3090

Plain runs only: one device, one request, no speculative decoding, the whole model in memory. Each row is one model size at one bit class, with the other engines' plain runs of the same model on this card beside it. Context length and build still differ between runs, and each side shows its own.

Modelllama.cppOther engines
Qwen3.8 27B 4-bit35.7 t/smedian of 2, 128K context, 1 not stated
vLLM 38.4 t/sone report, 144K to 200K context
Gemma 4 31B 4-bit36.5 t/sone report, context not statedno other engine reported
Llama 3 8B 4-bit111.7 t/sone report, 1K contextno other engine reported
Muse 30B 4-bit30.0 t/sone report, 8K contextno other engine reported
Qwen2.5 32B 4-bit28.0 t/sone report, 32K contextno other engine reported
Qwen3.6 27B 4-bit42.0 t/sone report, 100K contextno other engine reported
Qwen3.6 35B · 3B active 3-bit120.0 t/sone report, 256K contextno other engine reported
Qwen3.6 35B · 3B active 4-bit101.7 t/sone report, 64K contextno other engine reported
Qwen3.8 27B 3-bit42.3 t/sone report, 16K contextno other engine reported

61 llama.cpp reports on the NVIDIA RTX 3090

Newest first. A run on several cards, with speculative decoding, with part of the model in system RAM or with batched requests says so, since each describes a different setup.

Filter these reports on the homepage

Frequently asked

How fast is llama.cpp on the NVIDIA RTX 3090?

On the NVIDIA RTX 3090, llama.cpp runs Qwen3.8 27B at 4-bit at a median 35.7 tokens per second for generation, from 2 plain runs (128K context, 1 not stated).

Is llama.cpp faster than other engines on the NVIDIA RTX 3090?

Same card, same model size and bit class, plain runs only: Qwen3.8 27B at 4-bit gives llama.cpp 35.7 t/s (2 runs) and vLLM 38.4 t/s (1). Context length and engine build differ between the runs, so treat it as a lead, not a benchmark.