llamaperf

NVIDIA RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell reports

71 reports. These are individual setups, not a controlled benchmark. NVIDIA RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell speeds and models →

Tone: positiveNVIDIA hardware
generation:
110.0 tokens/s
quant:
NVFP4 (safetensors)
mtp (multi-token prediction):
on

Reported by the source; GPU count, offloading and concurrent requests can change these figures. Prompt-processing speed is shown only when the source reports it; generation speed cannot tell us time to first token. Check the full setup before comparing.

codingtool-usevisionagentic

User reports Qwen3.8-Flash-Next at roughly 110 t/s, ranging from 76 to 125 t/s, on a single RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell with 96 GB, at 165,000 to 170,000 tokens of context. Setup is vLLM with the NVFP4 quant and INT4 quantized PLE n-grams, MTP speculative decoding, prefix caching, and PLE CPU offload. The user praises quality for coding and agentic tasks.

Sep 7, 2026
NVIDIA hardware
generation:
109.1 tokens/s
prompt processing (prefill):
1955.0 tokens/s
quant:
UD-IQ4_XS (GGUF)

Reported by the source; GPU count, offloading and concurrent requests can change these figures. Prompt-processing speed is input throughput, not time to first token. Check the full setup before comparing.

User benchmarks Qwen3.8 Flash Next across VRAM tiers from 8 GB to 96 GB with llama.cpp b10666. CPU-only decode reaches 8.34 tok/s and full 96 GB decode reaches 109.07 tok/s. At 245K context, decode ranges from 14.89 tok/s on 24 GB to 21.61 tok/s on 96 GB. The model activates 6B params per token (MoE). RAM-resident loading gives 1.87x prefill versus mmap. Non-unified KV reaches 92.0 tok/s total at concurrency 16. A PLE table on CUDA causes a 55.6x decode slowdown, from 108.5 to 1.95 tok/s.

Sep 7, 2026
Tone: positiveNVIDIA hardware
quant:
FP8

User benchmarks Qwen3.8-27B FP8 on one RTX PRO 6000 in Paddock, an open-source inference engine in Rust/C++ with its own CUDA kernels, reaching 1062 tok/s at 32 clients against 958 for vLLM and 844 for SGLang. Paddock is faster than vLLM in 13/13 cells, by 1.02x to 1.19x, and faster than llama.cpp Q8_0 in 13/13, by 1.5x to 37x.

Sep 7, 2026
Tone: mixedNVIDIA hardware
generation:
40.0 tokens/s
prompt processing (prefill):
2000.0 tokens/s
quant:
IQ4 (GGUF)
kv:
Q8

Reported by the source; GPU count, offloading and concurrent requests can change these figures. Prompt-processing speed is input throughput, not time to first token. Check the full setup before comparing.

User reports prefill around 2000 t/s and decode around 40 t/s for a single request. With 2-4 parallel requests, prefill drops to 500-1000 t/s and decode to 10-20 t/s. User asks for a better setup for 2-4 slots with q4 quants or better and q8 KV cache or better, and mentions trying vLLM recipes before.

Sep 7, 2026
Tone: positiveNVIDIA hardware
agenticcodinglong-context

User reports Mimo 2.5 stays fast at large context on dual RTX Pro 6000, using 5-to-1 sliding-window attention similar to Gemma 3. User also mentions Step 3.7 Flash with 3-to-1 sliding-window attention at ~40 t/s at 178k context. User notes MiniMax M3 and DeepSeek V4 have kernel issues on Blackwell consumer GPUs.

Aug 28, 2026
NVIDIA hardware
generation:
57.4 tokens/s
quant:
Q6_K (GGUF)
kv:
F16

Reported by the source; GPU count, offloading and concurrent requests can change these figures. Prompt-processing speed is shown only when the source reports it; generation speed cannot tell us time to first token. Check the full setup before comparing.

User benchmarks Tencent's Hy3, a 295B MoE with 21B active, at 57.4 tok/s generation with the Q6_K GGUF on 8x RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell. Setup is llama.cpp llama-bench with layer split and F16 KV cache, with the MTP/NextN block excluded. On the same cards Q4_K_M runs at 67.3 tok/s, Q3_K_L at 63.3 tok/s and IQ2_M at 78.7 tok/s. The user's Nemotron-Labs-Audex-30B-A3B quants run at 287 (Q8_0), 334 (Q5_K_M), 345 (Q4_K_M) and 329 (MXFP4_MOE) tok/s on 2x RTX PRO 6000 Max-Q.

Aug 28, 2026
Tone: positiveNVIDIA hardware
generation:
67.0 tokens/s
quant:
AD-Q4_K_M (GGUF)

Reported by the source; GPU count, offloading and concurrent requests can change these figures. Prompt-processing speed is shown only when the source reports it; generation speed cannot tell us time to first token. Check the full setup before comparing.

creative-writing

User compares AD-Q4_K_M, AD-Q5_K_M, AD-Q6_K, and Q8_0 quants of Qwen 3.8 27B on an RTX PRO 6000, reporting top-1 accuracy and KLD against BF16. Generation speeds are 67, 57, 49, and 50 tok/s respectively. The user recommends AD-Q6_K as the safest pick.

Aug 28, 2026
NVIDIA hardware

User benchmarks Qwen3.6 27B BF16 and Qwen3.6 35B BF16. For the 35B, best generation throughput is 3500 t/s at 128 concurrency with MTP off, and prompt throughput is 30000 t/s. The 27B was also tested with MTP on and off.

May 25, 2026
Tone: positiveNVIDIA hardware

User reports FastDMS, a DMS KV-cache compression implementation, decoding 1.5-2x faster than vLLM BF16/FP8 with 5-8x less KV memory. Benchmarks cover Llama-3.2-1B and Qwen3-8B DMS checkpoints, with KLD and token match comparable or better than vLLM's FP8/TurboQuant. Training took about 20 min on an RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell.

May 5, 2026
Tone: mixedNVIDIA hardware
codingsummarization

User compares Qwen3.6-27B with and without thinking against Coder-Next. Qwen3.6-27B with thinking disabled is the most consistent at a 95.8% ship rate, and Qwen3.6-27B and Coder-Next are statistically tied overall. Qwen3.6-35B-A3B performed poorly and was dropped.

May 4, 2026