llamaperf

Gemma 4 reports

168 reports. These are individual setups, not a controlled benchmark. Gemma 4 speeds by hardware →

Tone: positiveNVIDIA hardware
generation:
55.0 tokens/s
quant:
Q4_K_M (GGUF)

Reported by the source; GPU count, offloading and concurrent requests can change these figures. Prompt-processing speed is shown only when the source reports it; generation speed cannot tell us time to first token. Check the full setup before comparing.

text-generation

User reports about 55 t/s on an RTX 4070 12GB. The figure is estimated from compute-market tiers rather than a measured run.

May 1, 2026
Tone: positiveNVIDIA hardware
generation:
60.0 tokens/s
quant:
Q4_K_M (GGUF)

Reported by the source; GPU count, offloading and concurrent requests can change these figures. Prompt-processing speed is shown only when the source reports it; generation speed cannot tell us time to first token. Check the full setup before comparing.

text-generation

User reports E2B at about 60 t/s on an RTX 3060 12GB. The figure is estimated from compute-market tiers rather than measured.

May 1, 2026
Tone: positiveNVIDIA hardware
generation:
45.0 tokens/s
quant:
Q4_K_M (GGUF)

Reported by the source; GPU count, offloading and concurrent requests can change these figures. Prompt-processing speed is shown only when the source reports it; generation speed cannot tell us time to first token. Check the full setup before comparing.

text-generation

User reports about 45 t/s on an RTX 3060 12GB. The E4B model fits easily.

May 1, 2026
Tone: positiveNVIDIA hardware
quant:
NVFP4 (safetensors)

User reports nvidia/Gemma-4-26B-A4B-NVFP4 running on an RTX 5090 with 80% of the 32 GB allocated, reaching around 50k context. The model is 18.8 GB. Benchmarks compare baseline against NVFP4: GPQA Diamond 80.30% vs 79.90%, AIME 2025 88.95% vs 90.00%, MMLU Pro 85.00% vs 84.80%, LiveCodeBench pass@1 80.50% vs 79.80%, IFBench 77.77% vs 78.1%, and IFEval 96.60% vs 96.40%.

May 1, 2026
Tone: positiveNVIDIA hardware
generation:
149.6 tokens/s
quant:
Q4_K_M (GGUF)

Reported by the source; GPU count, offloading and concurrent requests can change these figures. Prompt-processing speed is shown only when the source reports it; generation speed cannot tell us time to first token. Check the full setup before comparing.

text-generation

User reports about 150 t/s generation. The model is described as a star performer.

May 1, 2026
NVIDIA hardware
generation:
16.9 tokens/s
quant:
bf16 (safetensors)

Reported by the source; GPU count, offloading and concurrent requests can change these figures. Prompt-processing speed is shown only when the source reports it; generation speed cannot tell us time to first token. Check the full setup before comparing.

text-generation

User reports bf16 with no quantization at 10.25 GB VRAM and 61 ms TTFT. Source is dev.to Gaurav Vij.

May 1, 2026
Tone: positiveApple hardware
generation:
15-20 tokens/s
quant:
Q4 (GGUF)

Reported by the source; GPU count, offloading and concurrent requests can change these figures. Prompt-processing speed is shown only when the source reports it; generation speed cannot tell us time to first token. Check the full setup before comparing.

text-generation

User reports Gemma 4 at 15-20 t/s, a range the user calls usable for simple tasks.

May 1, 2026

Gemma 4 26B (4B active)

m5 pro (18 core cpu, 20 core gpu) · Ollama

Tone: positive
generation:
68.8 tokens/s
prompt processing (prefill):
204.1 tokens/s

Reported by the source; GPU count, offloading and concurrent requests can change these figures. Prompt-processing speed is input throughput, not time to first token. Check the full setup before comparing.

User reports 204.07 t/s prompt eval and 68.76 t/s generation on an M5 Pro with 48 GB RAM.

May 1, 2026