llamaperf

Local model performance on your hardware

Find which open-weight LLMs fit in your GPU or Mac and compare the speeds people report on setups like yours.

Join the community

Follow along:XLinkedIn

What runs on your hardware?

Pick your GPU or Mac, then read the speeds people reported on it, or estimate which models fit and how fast they run.

Free to use. No account needed. Memory estimates and community measurements are labelled separately.

Looking for a particular model?

Search for a model to see its reported speeds across GPUs and Macs.

Local model performance reports from the community

These are individual setups, not a controlled benchmark. Compare GPU count, quantization, context and offloading before comparing speeds. How to read a report →

Model: MiniMax M3.1
Compare setup details

Exact recorded values. Context may be a configured limit; matching filters does not establish identical prompts, offloading or concurrency.

MiniMax M3.1 428B Flash

8× NVIDIA A40 48GB · TensorSharp · 65,536 ctx

Tone: positiveNVIDIA hardware
generation:
22.9 tokens/s
prompt processing (prefill):
2567.0 tokens/s
quant:
UD-Q4_K_XL (GGUF)
kv:
F16
visiontool-useagentic

User benchmarks MiniMax-M3.1-Flash 428B at 22.9 t/s decode and 2,567 tok/s prefill at 64K context on 8x NVIDIA A40 with TensorSharp. Setup is TensorSharp with Unsloth UD-Q4_K_XL GGUF (232.3 GiB of model files), F16 KV cache, layer splitting, and speculative decoding disabled. Against Unsloth's llama.cpp support branch on the same files, 64K prefill was 262 tok/s and decode 15.4 t/s; short-chat decode was nearly tied at 26.3 vs 26.0 t/s. Tensor parallelism reached about 41 t/s short-chat decode, and DSpark with confidence gating raised mean generation from 22.9 to 32.3 t/s.

Oct 25, 2026

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

8× NVIDIA A40 48GB · TensorSharp · 65,536 ctx

NVIDIA hardware
generation:
22.9 tokens/s
prompt processing (prefill):
2567.0 tokens/s
quant:
UD-Q4_K_XL (GGUF)
kv:
F16
visiontool-use

User benchmarks MiniMax-M3.1-Flash at 22.9 tok/s decode at 64K context on 8x NVIDIA A40 GPUs. Setup is TensorSharp with the Unsloth UD-Q4_K_XL GGUF, F16 KV cache, layer splitting, and no speculative decoding. Prefill was 1,699 tok/s at 8K, 2,449 tok/s at 32K and 2,567 tok/s at 64K; time to first token on a 64K prompt was 40.0 s. Results are early, from one host and one quantization, and are compared against llama.cpp (llama-server with flash attention and --no-kv-unified).

Oct 25, 2026
Showing 1–2 of 2
Page 1 of 1

Community benchmarks snapshot

Records by GPU

AMD Strix Halo 128GB311NVIDIA RTX 3090216NVIDIA RTX 5090160NVIDIA DGX Spark86NVIDIA RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell70NVIDIA RTX 5060 Ti 16GB67M5 Max 48GB66NVIDIA RTX 3060 12GB63AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 32GB61NVIDIA RTX 409053

Records by model

2570 total
Qwen3.81205
Qwen3.6273
Gemma 4164
DeepSeek V4 Flash148
Qwen3.5116
Qwen371
other593

Records by engine

1895 total
llama.cpp980
vLLM201
Strata128
MLX106
Ollama79
other401

Use cases

coding 679agentic 431long-context 319tool-use 187vision 126summarization 61math 51creative-writing 42multilingual 26rp 12text-generation 9reasoning 3
coding679agentic431long-context319tool-use187vision126summarization61math51creative-writing42

Median generation t/s by GPU

On Qwen3.8 27B at 4-bit, plain single-GPU runs. Full ranking

RTX 509073RTX Pro 600067M5 Ultra 256GB50RX 7900 XTX43RTX 409040RTX 309037RX 7800 XT 16GB35RTX 5090 Laptop 24GB34V100 32GB31Radeon AI PRO R9700 32GB30

Prompt processing, same model

M5 Ultra 256GB1800RX 7900 XTX640RTX 40901949RTX 3090561V100 32GB941Radeon AI PRO R9700 32GB1287RTX 3080 20GB997Arc Pro B70512M1 Ultra 128GB153Arc Pro B60 24GB380

Reports by model size

Qwen3.8 27B649Qwen3.8 125B · 6B active468Qwen3.6 35B · 3B active160DeepSeek V4 Flash 284B · 13B active131Qwen3.6 27B75Gemma 4 26B · 4B active42GLM-5.3 320B · 18B active41DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 552B · 16B active41

Quants

Q4_K_M331UD-Q4_K_XL152NVFP4144Q8_01054-bit86IQ4_XS75Q4_K_XL74MXFP465IQ3_XXS61Q454