llamaperf

Local model performance on your hardware

Find which open-weight LLMs fit in your GPU or Mac and compare the speeds people report on setups like yours.

Join the community

Follow along:XLinkedIn

What runs on your hardware?

Pick your GPU or Mac, then read the speeds people reported on it, or estimate which models fit and how fast they run.

Free to use. No account needed. Memory estimates and community measurements are labelled separately.

Looking for a particular model?

Search for a model to see its reported speeds across GPUs and Macs.

Local model performance reports from the community

These are individual setups, not a controlled benchmark. Compare GPU count, quantization, context and offloading before comparing speeds. How to read a report →

Model: Kimi K3.1
Compare setup details

Exact recorded values. Context may be a configured limit; matching filters does not establish identical prompts, offloading or concurrency.

Apple hardware
generation:
2.0 tokens/s
prompt processing (prefill):
8.4 tokens/s

User reports Kimi 3.1 running locally on a MacBook Pro M5 Max 128GB at 2 tok/s decode and 8.4 tok/s prefill. The run uses a source build of the ds4 engine with weights downloaded separately. No quant, context length or KV cache setting is stated.

Nov 10, 2026
Tone: positiveNVIDIA hardware
generation:
10.8 tokens/s
quant:
2.81/2.56/1.44 bpw 3-tier MoE (~1.92 bpw avg)
codingmath

User reports Kimi-K3.1-Pro-Coder at 10.8 tok/s single-stream decode and 36.8 tok/s batch/prefill eval on a single RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell (96 GB) with 176 GB RAM in Colab. Setup is the Strata 3-tier MoE offloading engine with dr-triton fused dequant kernels, a 775 GB quant (down from 1.77 TB) with routed experts at 2.81/2.56/1.44 bpw (~1.92 bpw average) and shared experts, attention and embeddings in BF16/F32; experts split across GPU VRAM, pinned RAM and NVMe mmap with router lookahead prefetching at a 97.9% hit rate. The 2.8T model keeps 96.67% on both AIME 2025 and LiveCodeBench (29/30 each), with 95.20% top-1 and 99.92% top-5 token agreement against the base and mean KLD 0.0191. The post also lists projected throughput for other hardware (e.g. ~4-5.5 tok/s decode on a single 4090/5090, ~18-22 tok/s on 2x PRO 6000/H100), which are estimates rather than measurements.

Nov 8, 2026
Showing 1–2 of 2
Page 1 of 1

Community benchmarks snapshot

Records by GPU

AMD Strix Halo 128GB338NVIDIA RTX 3090244NVIDIA RTX 5090183NVIDIA DGX Spark95NVIDIA RTX 3060 12GB84NVIDIA RTX 5060 Ti 16GB79NVIDIA RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell78AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 32GB73NVIDIA RTX 5070 Ti67M5 Max 48GB67

Records by model

2991 total
Qwen3.81442
Qwen3.6310
Gemma 4171
DeepSeek V4 Flash150
Qwen3.5136
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash86
other696

Records by engine

2153 total
llama.cpp1065
vLLM215
Strata204
MLX107
Ollama91
other471

Use cases

coding 854agentic 560long-context 388tool-use 245vision 156summarization 70math 67creative-writing 53multilingual 33rp 16text-generation 9reasoning 3
coding854agentic560long-context388tool-use245vision156summarization70math67creative-writing53

Median generation t/s by GPU

On Qwen3.8 27B at 4-bit, plain single-GPU runs. Full ranking

RTX 509080RTX Pro 600067RTX 5070 Ti55M5 Ultra 256GB50RX 7900 XTX43RTX 409040RTX 309037RX 7800 XT 16GB35RTX 5090 Laptop 24GB34RX 7900 XT32

Prompt processing, same model

M5 Ultra 256GB1800RX 7900 XTX640RTX 40901949RTX 3090561RX 7900 XT800M3 Ultra 512GB391V100 32GB941Radeon AI PRO R9700 32GB1287RTX 3080 20GB997Arc Pro B70512

Reports by model size

Qwen3.8 27B770Qwen3.8 125B · 6B active602Qwen3.6 35B · 3B active218DeepSeek V4 Flash 284B · 13B active133Qwen3.6 27B81DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 552B · 16B active76Gemma 4 26B · 4B active60GLM-5.3 320B · 18B active51

Quants

Q4_K_M366UD-Q4_K_XL174NVFP4154Q8_01144-bit99IQ4_XS80Q4_K_XL79IQ3_XXS76IQ3_S71MXFP469