llamaperf

Local model performance on your hardware

Find which open-weight LLMs fit in your GPU or Mac and compare the speeds people report on setups like yours.

Join the community

Follow along:XLinkedIn

What runs on your hardware?

Pick your GPU or Mac, then read the speeds people reported on it, or estimate which models fit and how fast they run.

Free to use. No account needed. Memory estimates and community measurements are labelled separately.

Looking for a particular model?

Search for a model to see its reported speeds across GPUs and Macs.

Local model performance reports from the community

These are individual setups, not a controlled benchmark. Compare GPU count, quantization, context and offloading before comparing speeds. How to read a report →

GPU: Intel Arc B580 12GB
Compare setup details

Exact recorded values. Context may be a configured limit; matching filters does not establish identical prompts, offloading or concurrency.

Tone: positiveIntel hardware
generation:
45.0 tokens/s
quant:
ternary

User reports Bonsai-2 27B running at around 45 t/s on an Intel Arc B580 12GB. Setup is PrismML's llama.cpp fork with custom SYCL kernels and fusions, which the user wrote and PrismML merged (PR #356, about 7,700 lines). The models use ternary weights (-1, 0, +1). The user also trained small ternary models in cloud data centres that run at home on the B580: SmolLM2-360M shrunk from 690 MB to 162 MB at 1.4x the original perplexity and about 94% of benchmark scores, and SmolLM2-135M from 257 MB to 73 MB at about 1.5x and about 91%. They say these are not yet Bonsai quality, whose models keep about 99%. The models are not released yet.

Oct 21, 2026
Tone: positiveIntel hardware
prompt processing (prefill):
4454.0 tokens/s
quant:
Q4_0 (GGUF)

User reports Llama 2 7B Q4_0 prompt processing at 4,454 t/s on an Intel Arc B580 with llama.cpp's SYCL backend, ahead of the RTX 5060 Ti's 4,196 t/s on llama.cpp's scoreboard. Prompt processing is 3.3x to 6.6x faster than llama.cpp master across Llama 2, Llama 3.1, Qwen3.5 and Gemma 4, with long chats 1.5x faster at 32K and 1.6x at 64K. Short batches on K-quant models are up to 2.5x faster and still in progress; perplexity is unchanged. The changes are on the user's GitHub branches and submitted for upstreaming.

Oct 21, 2026

Bonsai 2 27B

Intel Arc B580 12GB · llama.cpp · 128,000 ctx

Tone: positiveIntel hardware
generation:
48.6 tokens/s
prompt processing (prefill):
1480.0 tokens/s
quant:
ternary (GGUF)
kv:
q4_0
mtp (multi-token prediction):
on
coding

User reports ternary Bonsai 2 27B at 48.6 t/s plain decode on an Intel Arc B580 12GB. Setup is a custom llama.cpp SYCL branch with ternary weights, q4_0 KV cache and 128K context, with no speculation for this figure. With MTP, n-gram speculation and a trimmed draft head the model reaches 85 t/s writing code, 79 t/s in chat and 89 t/s at 115K tokens of history, with prompt reading at ~1,480 t/s. The user's own draft head was used for the video, so public results may be a few percent lower.

Oct 12, 2026
Tone: positiveIntel hardware
generation:
21.0 tokens/s
quant:
IQ2_XS (GGUF)
kv:
INT8
agenticvisionlong-context

User reports Qwen3.8-Flash-Next at 21.0 tok/s on an Intel Arc B580 12GB. Setup is Strata v0.1.40.4 with IQ2_XS quantization and INT8 KV cache, 256K context, 2808 resident expert slots, speculative decoding with MTP. Long-context stress test at 74,213 prompt tokens sustained 17.8 tok/s for 237.7 seconds. User compares to llama.cpp/Ollama offload at 1.5-3.0 tok/s and previous Strata version at 17.1 tok/s.

Oct 8, 2026

Bonsai 2 27B

Intel Arc B580 12GB · llama.cpp · 131,072 ctx

Tone: positiveIntel hardware
generation:
42.3 tokens/s
prompt processing (prefill):
895.0 tokens/s
quant:
PTQ1_0 (GGUF)
kv:
q4_0
codingagentic

User reports Bonsai 2 27B (PTQ1_0 ternary) at 42.3 t/s plain generation and 895 t/s prompt reading on an Intel Arc B580 12GB. Setup is llama.cpp's llama-bench (tg128 and pp512) on the SYCL backend with PTQ1_0 GGUF weights. With speculation, fresh code answers reach 90 t/s, renames 365 t/s, edits 258 t/s. At 48K context new code runs 63 t/s and edits 34 t/s; at 115K, 44 and 27 t/s. The user also compares against the Vulkan backend and PrismML's own fork, and reports KL divergence of 0.00022 against reference logits.

Oct 8, 2026

GLM-4 9B

Intel Arc B580 12GB · llama.cpp · 2,048 ctx

Tone: negativeIntel hardware
generation:
21.3 tokens/s
quant:
Q4_0 (GGUF)
kv:
F16

User reports GLM-4 9B at 21.25 t/s on an Intel Arc B580 12GB, with GPU utilization near 40%. Setup is llama.cpp (ipex-llm[cpp] build 2024.12.17) with Q4_0 GGUF and F16 KV cache, 2048 context, all 41 layers offloaded to the GPU. The user considers the performance low for the hardware. The prompt eval figure of 41.47 t/s is over only 5 tokens and is not reported as a prefill rate.

Oct 6, 2026
Intel hardware
generation:
12.7 tokens/s
prompt processing (prefill):
260.5 tokens/s
quant:
Q4_K_M (GGUF)

User reports Qwen3 4B at 260.52 t/s prompt processing and 12.71 t/s generation on an Intel Arc B580. Setup is llama.cpp (IPEX-LLM build) with Q4_K_M GGUF, all 99 layers offloaded to the GPU via SYCL. Compared against stock Ollama on the same model, which reached 14.23 t/s prompt and 6.20 t/s generation, making the Arc GPU about 18.3x faster at prompt processing and 2.05x faster at generation.

Sep 29, 2026

Qwen3.8 27B

Intel Arc B580 12GB · FreeToken · 128 ctx

Intel hardware
generation:
0.7 tokens/s
quant:
UD-Q2_K_XL (GGUF)

User reports Qwen3.8 27B UD-Q2_K_XL at 0.65 tok/s decode on an Intel Arc B580 12GB. Setup is the FreeToken-Intel fork with PyTorch XPU plus native SYCL packed matvecs, context 128 and KV cache 256 tokens; TTFT 37.58 s and model load 47.39 s, with 9.47 GB model state. The run used a fixed 16-token forced decode length and is presented as a development baseline, not a general performance claim; the same table lists Llama 3.2 1B Q4_K_M at 18.29 tok/s, Gemma 4 12B Q4_K_XL at 2.85 tok/s and Ternary-Bonsai 27B PQ2_0 at 2.10 tok/s.

Sep 29, 2026
Showing 1–8 of 8
Page 1 of 1

Community benchmarks snapshot

Records by GPU

AMD Strix Halo 128GB320NVIDIA RTX 3090219NVIDIA RTX 5090170NVIDIA DGX Spark91NVIDIA RTX 5060 Ti 16GB72NVIDIA RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell70M5 Max 48GB67NVIDIA RTX 3060 12GB65AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 32GB63NVIDIA RTX 409057

Records by model

2698 total
Qwen3.81272
Qwen3.6284
Gemma 4168
DeepSeek V4 Flash149
Qwen3.5121
Qwen375
other629

Records by engine

1980 total
llama.cpp1008
vLLM205
Strata150
MLX106
Ollama83
other428

Use cases

coding 737agentic 466long-context 342tool-use 207vision 137summarization 61math 57creative-writing 46multilingual 29rp 13text-generation 9reasoning 3
coding737agentic466long-context342tool-use207vision137summarization61math57creative-writing46

Median generation t/s by GPU

On Qwen3.8 27B at 4-bit, plain single-GPU runs. Full ranking

RTX 509080RTX Pro 600067M5 Ultra 256GB50RX 7900 XTX43RTX 409040RTX 309038RX 7800 XT 16GB35RTX 5090 Laptop 24GB34M3 Ultra 512GB32V100 32GB31

Prompt processing, same model

M5 Ultra 256GB1800RX 7900 XTX640RTX 40901949RTX 3090561M3 Ultra 512GB391V100 32GB941Radeon AI PRO R9700 32GB1287RTX 3080 20GB997Arc Pro B70512M1 Ultra 128GB153

Reports by model size

Qwen3.8 27B709Qwen3.8 125B · 6B active499Qwen3.6 35B · 3B active193DeepSeek V4 Flash 284B · 13B active132Qwen3.6 27B80Gemma 4 26B · 4B active59DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 552B · 16B active50GLM-5.3 320B · 18B active45

Quants

Q4_K_M341UD-Q4_K_XL157NVFP4148Q8_01074-bit91IQ4_XS76Q4_K_XL74MXFP466IQ3_XXS65IQ3_S59