llamaperf

Local model performance on your hardware

Find which open-weight LLMs fit in your GPU or Mac and compare the speeds people report on setups like yours.

Join the community

Follow along:XLinkedIn

What runs on your hardware?

Pick your GPU or Mac, then read the speeds people reported on it, or estimate which models fit and how fast they run.

Free to use. No account needed. Memory estimates and community measurements are labelled separately.

Looking for a particular model?

Search for a model to see its reported speeds across GPUs and Macs.

Local model performance reports from the community

These are individual setups, not a controlled benchmark. Compare GPU count, quantization, context and offloading before comparing speeds. How to read a report →

GPU: NVIDIA RTX 4050 6GB
Compare setup details

Exact recorded values. Context may be a configured limit; matching filters does not establish identical prompts, offloading or concurrency.

NVIDIA hardware
generation:
14.0 tokens/s
quant:
Q4_K_S (GGUF)

User compares DanilAI and LM Studio running Qwen3-30B-A3B-Instruct-2507 on an RTX 4050 Laptop (6 GB VRAM) with a Ryzen 7 7435HS and 24 GB RAM. LM Studio with Q4_K_S quantization reached 14.03 tokens/sec; DanilAI with hybrid FP16/8-bit/4-bit precision plus DanilDrive compression reached 25.0 tokens/sec. A separate test ran Qwen3-0.6B in FP16 with DanilDrive, reporting approximately 45% lossless compression. OBS Studio was recording throughout and may have affected performance.

Oct 16, 2026
Tone: positiveNVIDIA hardware
generation:
76.2 tokens/s

User reports Qwen3-0.6B at 76.2 t/s on an RTX 4050 Laptop 6GB, a 4.19x speedup over uncompressed bf16 (18.2 t/s). Setup is a custom engine (DanilDrive-W) with lossless dictionary-compressed bf16 weights, decompressed inline in the CUDA kernel; file size drops from 1433.7 MB to 765.5 MB (-46.6%). User also tested Qwen3-Coder-30B-A3B against Ollama and LM Studio on the same Q4_K_M GGUF, getting 16-18 t/s versus their 24-26 t/s, and notes greedy decoding can diverge after ~200 characters due to float summation order.

Oct 6, 2026

LFM2.5 1.2B

NVIDIA RTX 4050 6GB · LM Studio · 256,000 ctx

Tone: positiveNVIDIA hardware
generation:
129.0 tokens/s
prompt processing (prefill):
8500.0 tokens/s
tool-usesummarization

User benchmarks 20 small models on an RTX 4050 6GB. Models tested include Granite 4.1 3B, Gemma-4-agentic-e2b, Nemotron-3-Nano-4B and LFM2.5-8B-A1B. The user selects LFM2.5-1.2B-Instruct as a cheap always-on model.

Aug 28, 2026
Showing 1–3 of 3
Page 1 of 1

Community benchmarks snapshot

Records by GPU

AMD Strix Halo 128GB313NVIDIA RTX 3090217NVIDIA RTX 5090161NVIDIA DGX Spark87NVIDIA RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell70NVIDIA RTX 5060 Ti 16GB67M5 Max 48GB67NVIDIA RTX 3060 12GB63AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 32GB61NVIDIA RTX 409054

Records by model

2583 total
Qwen3.81215
Qwen3.6274
Gemma 4165
DeepSeek V4 Flash148
Qwen3.5116
Qwen371
other594

Records by engine

1907 total
llama.cpp983
vLLM201
Strata131
MLX106
Ollama79
other407

Use cases

coding 685agentic 434long-context 323tool-use 189vision 126summarization 61math 51creative-writing 43multilingual 26rp 12text-generation 9reasoning 3
coding685agentic434long-context323tool-use189vision126summarization61math51creative-writing43

Median generation t/s by GPU

On Qwen3.8 27B at 4-bit, plain single-GPU runs. Full ranking

RTX 509073RTX Pro 600067M5 Ultra 256GB50RX 7900 XTX43RTX 409040RTX 309038RX 7800 XT 16GB35RTX 5090 Laptop 24GB34M3 Ultra 512GB32V100 32GB31

Prompt processing, same model

M5 Ultra 256GB1800RX 7900 XTX640RTX 40901949RTX 3090561M3 Ultra 512GB391V100 32GB941Radeon AI PRO R9700 32GB1287RTX 3080 20GB997Arc Pro B70512M1 Ultra 128GB153

Reports by model size

Qwen3.8 27B682Qwen3.8 125B · 6B active472Qwen3.6 35B · 3B active184DeepSeek V4 Flash 284B · 13B active131Qwen3.6 27B79Gemma 4 26B · 4B active59GLM-5.3 320B · 18B active42DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 552B · 16B active41

Quants

Q4_K_M332UD-Q4_K_XL153NVFP4144Q8_01054-bit87IQ4_XS75Q4_K_XL74MXFP465IQ3_XXS61Q454