llamaperf

Local model performance on your hardware

Find which open-weight LLMs fit in your GPU or Mac and compare the speeds people report on setups like yours.

Join the community

Follow along:XLinkedIn

What runs on your hardware?

Pick your GPU or Mac, then read the speeds people reported on it, or estimate which models fit and how fast they run.

Free to use. No account needed. Memory estimates and community measurements are labelled separately.

Looking for a particular model?

Search for a model to see its reported speeds across GPUs and Macs.

Local model performance reports from the community

These are individual setups, not a controlled benchmark. Compare GPU count, quantization, context and offloading before comparing speeds. How to read a report →

GPU: M2 Ultra 192GB
Compare setup details

Exact recorded values. Context may be a configured limit; matching filters does not establish identical prompts, offloading or concurrency.

Cyber-Tiel-Coder 35B-A3B / AX normal wiring / python-lru 219 input, 256 output / MTP

M2 Ultra 192GB · AX Engine

Apple hardware
generation:
152.5 tokens/s
quant:
AXQ MXFP4 mixed (MLX)
mtp (multi-token prediction):
on

User reports Cyber-Tiel-Coder-35B-A3B at 152.5 t/s on an M2 Ultra 192GB Mac Studio. Setup is the AX Engine with an AXQ MXFP4 trunk and protected MTP sidecar, one Metal GPU, expert streaming off. The figure is the median decode rate over six samples on a 219-input/256-output python-lru workload, with TTFT 505.93 ms; completion including TTFT was 117.59 t/s.

Oct 13, 2026

Tiel-Coder 35B (3B active) AX , native decode / python-lru

M2 Ultra 192GB · AX Engine (574d2d19 + 5e07befe; MLX 0.32.2)

Apple hardware
generation:
134.6 tokens/s
quant:
AXQ-MXFP4 (MLX)
mtp (multi-token prediction):
on
coding

User reports Tiel-Coder 35B-A3B at 134.6 t/s median native decode on a single Apple Mac Studio M2 Ultra with 192 GiB unified memory. Setup is AX Engine with the AXQ-MXFP4 MLX export, explicit throughput-MTP at maximum draft depth three, expert streaming off, and the model kept fully resident. Separate median completion throughput is 107.28 t/s including TTFT, with median native TTFT 494.41 ms; the 256-token output is total output, not the decode numerator.

Oct 11, 2026
Apple hardware
generation:
22.2 tokens/s
prompt processing (prefill):
325.3 tokens/s
quant:
MXFP4 / affine 8-bit mixed (MLX)
mtp (multi-token prediction):
on
coding

User reports Qwen3.8 Flash-Next at 22.2 t/s generation and 325.3 t/s prefill on an M2 Ultra 192GB. Setup is AX Engine at MXFP4 / affine 8-bit mixed, speculative decoding on, one request. Medians of 20 trials in defai-digital's AutomatosX benchmark of 2026-10-08. A source-reported measurement, not independently reproduced.

Oct 10, 2026
Apple hardware
generation:
32.7 tokens/s
prompt processing (prefill):
420.8 tokens/s
quant:
UD-Q4_K_M (GGUF)
kv:
Q8
flash attention:
on

User reports MiniMax M2.7 at 32.7 t/s generation and 420.8 t/s prefill on an M2 Ultra 192GB. Setup is llama.cpp at UD-Q4_K_M, one request, speculative decoding off. Token-weighted rates across four sequential agentic tasks in crypdick's run of 2026-08-10. A source-reported measurement, not independently reproduced.

Oct 10, 2026

Mimo 2.5

M2 Ultra 192GB · llama.cpp · 65,536 ctx

Apple hardware
generation:
37.9 tokens/s
prompt processing (prefill):
301.6 tokens/s
quant:
UD-Q3_K_M (GGUF)
kv:
q8_0
codingagentic

User reports MiMo-V2.5 at 37.87 t/s generation and 301.61 t/s prompt processing on an M2 Ultra 192GB Mac Studio. Setup is llama.cpp llama-server with UD-Q3_K_M GGUF, q8_0 KV cache, 65,536 context, Flash Attention on, gpu_layers 999, batch 2048, and 8,192 MiB cache_ram. Figures are token/time-weighted across four sequential real-world agentic tasks (n=1 each), not llama-bench or end-to-end throughput; one task hit its 8,192-token output cap and 258 of 2,290 prompt tokens were cached. Server peak RSS was 131.015 GiB.

Oct 9, 2026
Tone: mixedApple hardware
generation:
7.7 tokens/s
quant:
8 bit (GGUF)

User compares GGUF and MLX inference speeds on a Mac Studio M2 Ultra with 192GB, using LM Studio 0.3.10 with MLX 0.6. For Qwen2.5 72B 8-bit, GGUF reaches 7.68 tokens/sec while MLX drops to 0.42 tokens/sec. Smaller models show the opposite: Qwen2.5 0.5B 4-bit runs at 79 tokens/sec in GGUF versus 317 tokens/sec in MLX, and Mistral Small 22B 8-bit is roughly equal at 25.01 versus 25.96 tokens/sec. User reports MLX is 4-5x faster for very small models but about 10x slower for large ones, with the inflection point around 22B parameters, and notes MLX does not use much GPU for larger models while LM Studio lacks a layer-offload option for MLX.

Oct 4, 2026

Qwen3.8 27B

M2 Ultra 192GB · llama.cpp · 131,072 ctx

Apple hardware
generation:
22.4 tokens/s
prompt processing (prefill):
360.2 tokens/s
quant:
Q6_K_XL (GGUF)
kv:
Q8

User benchmarks Qwen3.8-27B at 22.38 t/s generation (tg128) and 360.22 t/s prompt processing (pp512) on a Mac Studio M2 Ultra with 192GB unified memory. Setup is llama.cpp build b10450 llama-bench with the Unsloth UD-Q6_K_XL quant (24.13 GiB), flash attention on, q8_0 K and V cache and batch and micro-batch 2048. The user serves the model through llama-server at 131072 context with MTP speculative decoding (draft-mtp, draft max 3), and gets around 16 t/s on the WebUI with a flappy bird game prompt.

Sep 7, 2026
Tone: positiveApple hardware
generation:
25.8 tokens/s
prompt processing (prefill):
250.0 tokens/s

User reports DeepSeek V4 Flash at 25.8 t/s, with a 42 t/s peak, on an M2 Ultra with 60 cores and 192gb. Setup is a custom llama.cpp fork with the model repacked losslessly to 141GiB, smaller than the public GGUFs, no KV cache quant, and an SSD KV cache with dynamic lanes, 1M context total across 8 lanes. Prompt processing is about 250 t/s at 8k-32k. The user compares this with 16 t/s on an M3 Ultra.

Sep 7, 2026
Apple hardware
generation:
28.0 tokens/s

User reports decode speeds at various context depths: 28 t/s at the start, 23.5 t/s at 45k, and 18 t/s at 192k. The run was maintained with 8k token output. Prefill performance is mentioned but no numbers are given.

Aug 3, 2026
Showing 1–9 of 9
Page 1 of 1

Community benchmarks snapshot

Records by GPU

AMD Strix Halo 128GB321NVIDIA RTX 3090219NVIDIA RTX 5090171NVIDIA DGX Spark91NVIDIA RTX 5060 Ti 16GB72NVIDIA RTX Pro 6000 Blackwell71M5 Max 48GB67NVIDIA RTX 3060 12GB65AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 32GB63NVIDIA RTX 409057

Records by model

2714 total
Qwen3.81282
Qwen3.6285
Gemma 4168
DeepSeek V4 Flash149
Qwen3.5121
Qwen375
other634

Records by engine

1989 total
llama.cpp1012
vLLM206
Strata151
MLX107
Ollama84
other429

Use cases

coding 740agentic 469long-context 344tool-use 209vision 143summarization 61math 58creative-writing 46multilingual 30rp 13text-generation 9reasoning 3
coding740agentic469long-context344tool-use209vision143summarization61math58creative-writing46

Median generation t/s by GPU

On Qwen3.8 27B at 4-bit, plain single-GPU runs. Full ranking

RTX 509080RTX Pro 600067M5 Ultra 256GB50RX 7900 XTX43RTX 409040RTX 309038RX 7800 XT 16GB35RTX 5090 Laptop 24GB34M3 Ultra 512GB32V100 32GB31

Prompt processing, same model

M5 Ultra 256GB1800RX 7900 XTX640RTX 40901949RTX 3090561M3 Ultra 512GB391V100 32GB941Radeon AI PRO R9700 32GB1287RTX 3080 20GB997Arc Pro B70512M1 Ultra 128GB153

Reports by model size

Qwen3.8 27B713Qwen3.8 125B · 6B active505Qwen3.6 35B · 3B active194DeepSeek V4 Flash 284B · 13B active132Qwen3.6 27B80Gemma 4 26B · 4B active59DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 552B · 16B active50GLM-5.3 320B · 18B active45

Quants

Q4_K_M343UD-Q4_K_XL158NVFP4149Q8_01074-bit93IQ4_XS76Q4_K_XL75MXFP466IQ3_XXS66IQ3_S59