llamaperf

What people run, by hardware

Pick the kind of machine you have. You'll see the model sizes people report running on it, most reported first, with the speed they typically get. It tells you what works on hardware like yours. It doesn't tell you which model gives the best answers.

To check a specific model on your exact card, use the calculator. For coding, see the coding models by VRAM.

Maker
NVIDIA
Apple Silicon
Unified-memory PCs
AMD and Intel
No GPU
Model size

NVIDIA 80 GB+

Workstation and datacenter cards. 70B-class and larger on one device. Memory speed 1,344 to 8,000 GB/s across the 9 devices with reports, so a typical figure here spans all of them. 73 single-device reports.

#ModelReports
1Qwen3.827B
Alibaba · mostly FP8
Gen 50 t/s (3 runs) · PP 3468 t/s (1 run) · with speculation 107 t/s (9)
20
2Qwen3.8 Flash-Next125B · 6B active
Alibaba · mostly NVFP4
Gen 105 t/s (6 runs) · PP 5110 t/s (6 runs) · with speculation 223 t/s (2)
14
3DeepSeek V4 Flash284B · 13B active
DeepSeek · mostly Q4_K_XL
Gen 46 t/s (3 runs) · PP 312 t/s (2 runs)
10
4Qwen3.627B
Alibaba · mostly Q4_K_M
Gen 38 t/s (1 run) · PP 907 t/s (1 run) · with speculation 118 t/s (1)
3
5GLM-4.5-Air106B · 12B active
mostly Q4_K_M
Gen 138 t/s (1 run)
2
6GLM-5.3 Flash320B · 18B active
Zhipu AI · mostly IQ2_XXS
Gen 70 t/s (1 run)
2
7Gemma 431B
Google DeepMind · mostly NVFP4
Gen 51 t/s (1 run) · PP 15359 t/s (1 run) · with speculation 125 t/s (1)
2
8Muse Glimmer30B
Meta · mostly BF16
Gen 35 t/s (1 run) · with speculation 57 t/s (1)
2
9DeepSeek V4 Pro1600B · 49B active
DeepSeek
No generation data
2
10Qwen3.635B · 3B active
Alibaba · mostly Q6_K
No generation data · with speculation 63 t/s (1)
2
11Qwen3-Next80B · 3B active
Alibaba · mostly W4A16
Gen 116 t/s (1 run)
1
12Qwen3.8 Flash-Next Abliterated125B · 6B active
Alibaba · mostly Q5
Gen 110 t/s (1 run)
1
13GLM-4.7 Flash30B
Zhipu AI
No generation data · with speculation 168 t/s (1)
1
14Gemma 34B
Google · mostly BF16
No generation data · with speculation 133 t/s (1)
1
15Gemma 4 Gemma 4 31B31B
Google DeepMind · mostly Q8_0
No generation data
1
16Llama 3.21B
Meta
No generation data
1
17Muse Muse Glimmer 30B28B
Meta · mostly Q8_0
No generation data
1
18Nemotron 3.5 Super VL120B · 12B active
mostly NVFP4
No generation data
1
19Qwen38B
Alibaba
No generation data
1
20Qwen3.535B · 3B active
Alibaba · mostly Q8_0
No generation data · PP 16460 t/s (1 run)
1
21Qwen3.6 abliterated27B
Alibaba · mostly BF16
No generation data
1
22Qwen3.6 Qwen3.6-35B-A3B35B · 3B active
Alibaba · mostly Q8_0
No generation data
1
23Qwen3.8 Qwen3.8-27B27B
Alibaba · mostly Q8_0
No generation data
1
24Qwen3.8 Sparkle 1.027B
Alibaba · mostly FP8
No generation data · with speculation 165 t/s (1)
1

Not in the table: 3 reports don't say which model size ran. 41 ran on more than one device, which says nothing about what one of them does.

How this list works

Each row is one model size, because a 27B and a 397B from the same family are different choices. Rows are ordered by how many people report running that size on this hardware.

Generation speed is the median of runs on one device, serving one request, without speculative decoding. PP is the median prompt-processing speed from plain runs that reported it, so its run count can be smaller. Speculative decoding (MTP, a draft model, DFlash, n-gram lookup) can make the same model several times faster, so those runs get their own column. A report that doesn't make clear which kind of run it was counts in neither.

Hardware is grouped by how much it holds and how fast its memory is, since memory speed sets how fast a model writes. Click a model for every report behind its row.