M5 Max 48GB vs AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 32GB for local LLMs
67 reports on the M5 Max 48GB and 61 on the AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 32GB
Which is faster for local LLMs?
On Qwen3.6 35B · 3B active at 4-bit, the M5 Max 48GB has 137.7 generation tokens/s (2 runs); prompt processing 3338.1 tokens/s (2 runs); the AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 32GB has 61.4 generation tokens/s (one run); prompt processing 7800.0 tokens/s (one run). Those are community reports whose engines and settings differ, so the gap is a rough sign, not a controlled measure of the two cards. Memory bandwidth, which caps how fast a card can write, is about the same on both (614 GB/s on the M5 Max 48GB, 640 on the AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 32GB). Across 2 shared models with generation measurements on both cards, the M5 Max 48GB's median is higher on 1 and the AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 32GB's on 1.
- Memory
- 48GB unified
- Memory bandwidth
- 614 GB/s
- FP16 compute
- not on record
- Reports
- 67
- Memory
- 32GB
- Memory bandwidth
- 640 GB/s
- FP16 compute
- 191 TFLOPS
- Reports
- 61
Measured on both
Generation and prompt processing speeds from plain runs (one device, one request, no speculative decoding, the whole model in the device's memory) of the same model size at the same bit class. Each side shows the engines and reported context behind its median. Context can mean a configured window or prompt depth, so these are community comparisons with differing settings. How to read these
| Model | M5 Max 48GB | AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 32GB |
|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.6 35B · 3B active4-bit | 137.72 runsPP 3338.1 (2 runs)llama.cpp, MLXcontext not stated | 61.4one runPP 7800.0 (one run)vLLM256K context |
| Qwen3.5 35B · 3B active4-bit | 111.2one runPP 3378.3 (one run)llama.cppcontext not stated | 149.2one runPP 3075.0 (one run)llama.cppcontext not stated |
Estimated by the calculator
The quant the calculator recommends for each card and its estimated speed at a 32,768-token context with 32 GB of system RAM, from memory bandwidth and the model's shape. Where a model was also measured above, the measurement wins.
| Model | M5 Max 48GB | AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 32GB |
|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.6 35B · 3B active | 88.4 t/sQ5_K_M | 58.2 t/sQ5_K_M |
| Qwen3.5 35B · 3B active | 88.4 t/sQ5_K_M | 58.2 t/sQ5_K_M |
| Qwen3.8 27B | 22.3 t/sQ6_K | 16.0 t/sQ6_K |
| Qwen3.8 125B · 6B active | doesn't fit at these settings | 18.7 t/sQ2_K, experts in RAM |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash 284B · 13B active | doesn't fit at these settings | doesn't fit at these settings |
| Qwen3.6 27B | 22.3 t/sQ6_K | 16.0 t/sQ6_K |
| Gemma 4 26B · 4B active | 43.2 t/sQ8_0 | 40.9 t/sQ6_K |
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 552B · 16B active | doesn't fit at these settings | doesn't fit at these settings |
Change the context, RAM or model in the calculator: M5 Max 48GB · AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 32GB
Every report on each card, with its source: M5 Max 48GB · AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700 32GB